DOJ-OGR-00017944.jpg

512 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 512 KB
Summary

A page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), Prosecutor Pomerantz, and Defense Attorney Pagliuca regarding a misunderstanding of a court order, followed by a recess. After the recess, Ms. Pomerantz raises an issue regarding Mr. Pagliuca's intent to cross-examine expert witness Dr. Rocchio on topics outside her direct testimony, specifically mentioning the 'halo effect' and 'suggestive memory'.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ms. Pomerantz Prosecutor/Government Counsel
Addressing the court regarding miscommunication and objecting to the scope of upcoming cross-examination.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the proceedings, addressing counsel regarding order violations and miscommunications.
Mr. Pagliuca Defense Counsel
Intends to cross-examine Dr. Rocchio.
Dr. Rocchio Witness/Expert
Subject of direct testimony and upcoming cross-examination regarding expert opinions.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Listed in the footer.
The Government
Referenced by Ms. Pomerantz representing the prosecution.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
Court Recess
Courtroom
2022-08-10
Procedural argument regarding cross-examination scope
Courtroom

Relationships (2)

Ms. Pomerantz Opposing Counsel Mr. Pagliuca
Conferred regarding cross-examination topics; represent Government vs Defense.
Mr. Pagliuca Attorney/Witness Dr. Rocchio
Pagliuca intends to cross-examine Rocchio.

Key Quotes (5)

"I don't think you intentionally violated the line of the order."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017944.jpg
Quote #1
"I don't understand the miscommunication between counsel, that is."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017944.jpg
Quote #2
"We had an opportunity to confer with the defense just now in terms of topics for cross-examination."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017944.jpg
Quote #3
"Mr. Pagliuca intends to cross-examine Dr. Rocchio about certain topics that were not the subject of her direct testimony..."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017944.jpg
Quote #4
"...such as things like the halo effect or suggestive memory and the like."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017944.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,209 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 71 of 228 747
LC2VMAX2 Rocchio - Direct
1 So again, I don't -- I don't think you intentionally
2 violated the line of the order.
3 MS. POMERANTZ: Thank you, your Honor.
4 THE COURT: I still don't understand the
5 miscommunication.
6 Anything else to take up?
7 I don't understand the miscommunication between
8 counsel, that is.
9 MS. POMERANTZ: Thank you, your Honor.
10 THE COURT: Anything else?
11 MS. POMERANTZ: Not from the government.
12 MR. PAGLIUCA: No, your Honor.
13 THE COURT: All right.
14 We will resume in ten. Thank you.
15 (Recess)
16 THE COURT: Matters to take up?
17 MS. POMERANTZ: Yes, your Honor. Apologies.
18 Thank you, your Honor.
19 We had an opportunity to confer with the defense just
20 now in terms of topics for cross-examination. And we
21 understand that Mr. Pagliuca intends to cross-examine Dr.
22 Rocchio about certain topics that were not the subject of her
23 direct testimony and of topics about which he has not proffered
24 an expert opinion, such as things like the halo effect or
25 suggestive memory and the like. And so I wanted to flag that
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017944

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document