A page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), Prosecutor Pomerantz, and Defense Attorney Pagliuca regarding a misunderstanding of a court order, followed by a recess. After the recess, Ms. Pomerantz raises an issue regarding Mr. Pagliuca's intent to cross-examine expert witness Dr. Rocchio on topics outside her direct testimony, specifically mentioning the 'halo effect' and 'suggestive memory'.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Prosecutor/Government Counsel |
Addressing the court regarding miscommunication and objecting to the scope of upcoming cross-examination.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, addressing counsel regarding order violations and miscommunications.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Counsel |
Intends to cross-examine Dr. Rocchio.
|
| Dr. Rocchio | Witness/Expert |
Subject of direct testimony and upcoming cross-examination regarding expert opinions.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| The Government |
Referenced by Ms. Pomerantz representing the prosecution.
|
"I don't think you intentionally violated the line of the order."Source
"I don't understand the miscommunication between counsel, that is."Source
"We had an opportunity to confer with the defense just now in terms of topics for cross-examination."Source
"Mr. Pagliuca intends to cross-examine Dr. Rocchio about certain topics that were not the subject of her direct testimony..."Source
"...such as things like the halo effect or suggestive memory and the like."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,209 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document