DOJ-OGR-00002165.jpg
633 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing (government memorandum in opposition)
File Size:
633 KB
Summary
This document is the first page of the Government's memorandum opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, filed on December 18, 2020, in the SDNY. The Government argues that Maxwell remains a serious flight risk due to her extensive financial resources and foreign ties, citing the Court's previous denial of bail on July 14, 2020. The prosecution asserts that the new defense motion merely repackages old arguments and offers financial details the Court previously deemed irrelevant to the flight risk determination.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the bail hearing; described as a serious flight risk with extensive financial resources and foreign ties.
|
| AJN | Judge |
Initials in case caption (Alison J. Nathan), presiding over the case.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Venue of the legal proceedings.
|
|
| United States of America |
The Government entity prosecuting the case.
|
|
| The Government |
Author of the memorandum opposing bail.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court.
|
Relationships (1)
Case caption: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -v.- GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Key Quotes (3)
"this Court concluded that the defendant posed a serious flight risk and that no condition or combination of conditions could ensure her appearance in court."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002165.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court’s conclusion was plainly correct, and the Renewed Bail Motion does nothing to undermine it."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002165.jpg
Quote #2
"the defendant continues to have extensive financial resources and foreign ties"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002165.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,763 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 100 Filed 12/18/20 Page 4 of 36
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
:
-v.- : 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
:
-v.- : 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL, :
Defendant. :
------------------------------------------------------------x
THE GOVERNMENT’S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT’S
RENEWED MOTION FOR RELEASE
RENEWED MOTION FOR RELEASE
The Government respectfully submits this memorandum in opposition to the defendant’s
renewed motion for release on bail, dated December 8, 2020 (the “Renewed Bail Motion”). Five
months ago, after thorough briefing and a nearly two-hour hearing, this Court concluded that the
defendant posed a serious flight risk and that no condition or combination of conditions could
ensure her appearance in court. The defense now asks this Court to reverse that finding by
essentially repackaging its prior arguments and presenting a more specific bail package. However,
at the July 14, 2020 bail hearing in this case, this Court rejected the defendant’s request to keep
the record open to allow the defendant to do precisely what she has done here—namely, present
more detailed information about her finances and a more concrete package—determining that
further information about her financial picture would be irrelevant because no combination of
conditions could ensure this defendant’s appearance. The Court’s conclusion was plainly correct,
and the Renewed Bail Motion does nothing to undermine it. The offense conduct outlined in the
Indictment remains incredibly serious, the evidence against the defendant remains strong, and the
defendant continues to have extensive financial resources and foreign ties, as well as the
renewed motion for release on bail, dated December 8, 2020 (the “Renewed Bail Motion”). Five
months ago, after thorough briefing and a nearly two-hour hearing, this Court concluded that the
defendant posed a serious flight risk and that no condition or combination of conditions could
ensure her appearance in court. The defense now asks this Court to reverse that finding by
essentially repackaging its prior arguments and presenting a more specific bail package. However,
at the July 14, 2020 bail hearing in this case, this Court rejected the defendant’s request to keep
the record open to allow the defendant to do precisely what she has done here—namely, present
more detailed information about her finances and a more concrete package—determining that
further information about her financial picture would be irrelevant because no combination of
conditions could ensure this defendant’s appearance. The Court’s conclusion was plainly correct,
and the Renewed Bail Motion does nothing to undermine it. The offense conduct outlined in the
Indictment remains incredibly serious, the evidence against the defendant remains strong, and the
defendant continues to have extensive financial resources and foreign ties, as well as the
1
DOJ-OGR-00002165
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document