DOJ-OGR-00016954.jpg
558 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
558 KB
Summary
Page 28 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The excerpt details a legal debate between prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach and defense attorney Mr. Everdell before the Judge ('The Court') regarding specific jury instructions concerning 'persuasion and inducement or enticement to travel' and 'significant or motivating purpose.' The Judge overrules a request regarding causation definitions.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Arguing regarding jury instructions on persuasion and inducement to travel.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, ruling on objections regarding jury instructions.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney (Defense) |
Requesting changes/clarifications to jury instructions regarding 'significant or motivating purpose'.
|
Organizations (2)
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding jury instructions in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (1)
Debating legal instructions in court transcript.
Key Quotes (3)
"So I will overrule the request."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016954.jpg
Quote #1
"Well, the instructions say that there has to be persuasion and inducement or enticement to travel, and the individual has to actually travel."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016954.jpg
Quote #2
"It seems to me that the basic suggestion applies additional causation beyond what's required by the ordinary meaning, and I don't see a basis for that."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016954.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,381 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 28 of 95 2766
LCI1MAX1
LCI1MAX1
1 travel, so that there has to be a causation, some effect of the
2 persuasion.
3 MR. ROHRBACH: Well, the instructions say that there
4 has to be persuasion and inducement or enticement to travel,
5 and the individual has to actually travel. Those concepts are
6 all already captured in the instruction. These instructions
7 for this element are just -- or this offense are quite standard
8 that are in the Court's jury charge.
9 THE COURT: Yeah, I think that's right. It seems to
10 me -- well, one, it's a standard charge for this provision;
11 two, it's accurate; three, adding -- I mean, it seems to me
12 that the basic suggestion applies additional causation beyond
13 what's required by the ordinary meaning, and I don't see a
14 basis for that. So I will overrule the request.
15 What's next?
16 MR. EVERDELL: One moment, your Honor?
17 THE COURT: Yes.
18 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, next request is at page 23.
19 THE COURT: Okay.
20 MR. EVERDELL: This is at line 15 through 22, which is
21 the instruction on significant or motivating purpose --
22 THE COURT: Yes.
23 MR. EVERDELL: -- which was a suggestion from the
24 defense, and we appreciate the Court's inclusion.
25 THE COURT: Well, I think you'd suggested significant
2 persuasion.
3 MR. ROHRBACH: Well, the instructions say that there
4 has to be persuasion and inducement or enticement to travel,
5 and the individual has to actually travel. Those concepts are
6 all already captured in the instruction. These instructions
7 for this element are just -- or this offense are quite standard
8 that are in the Court's jury charge.
9 THE COURT: Yeah, I think that's right. It seems to
10 me -- well, one, it's a standard charge for this provision;
11 two, it's accurate; three, adding -- I mean, it seems to me
12 that the basic suggestion applies additional causation beyond
13 what's required by the ordinary meaning, and I don't see a
14 basis for that. So I will overrule the request.
15 What's next?
16 MR. EVERDELL: One moment, your Honor?
17 THE COURT: Yes.
18 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, next request is at page 23.
19 THE COURT: Okay.
20 MR. EVERDELL: This is at line 15 through 22, which is
21 the instruction on significant or motivating purpose --
22 THE COURT: Yes.
23 MR. EVERDELL: -- which was a suggestion from the
24 defense, and we appreciate the Court's inclusion.
25 THE COURT: Well, I think you'd suggested significant
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016954
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document