DOJ-OGR-00009254.jpg

948 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (min-u-script)
File Size: 948 KB
Summary

This document is a transcript page from the case United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas (dated Feb 15, 2012), specifically a direct examination of a witness named Conrad. The testimony focuses on Conrad's alleged perjury and misconduct during jury selection (voir dire), specifically regarding lies about her residence in Bronxville and her husband's background (claiming he owned bus companies when he was actually a 'retired criminal' released from a NJ penitentiary in 2004). While included in a DOJ release batch (DOJ-OGR-00009254), the content pertains to the Daugerdas tax shelter case and juror misconduct, not directly to Jeffrey Epstein.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Conrad Witness
Target of direct examination; accused of lying during voir dire (jury selection) in a previous trial.
Mr. Okula Attorney
Makes objections during the examination.
Paul M. Daugerdas Defendant
Named in the case caption (United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas).
Conrad's Husband Subject
Described by the witness as a 'faithful, good husband' but identified by the examiner as having been in a New Jersey ...
The Court Judge
Rules on objections (Sustained/Overruled).

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States of America
Prosecution in the case US v. Daugerdas.
Southern District Reporters
Listed in the footer.
New Jersey Penitentiary
Location where Conrad's husband was incarcerated until 2004.

Timeline (2 events)

2004
Conrad's husband released from New Jersey penitentiary.
New Jersey
February 15, 2012
Court testimony of witness Conrad regarding juror misconduct.
Courtroom (likely SDNY based on reporter name)

Locations (3)

Location Context
Location where the witness allegedly misled the court about owning a house.
Location of the penitentiary and where the husband's bus companies were allegedly located.
Interstate highway mentioned in the quote about exploding buses.

Relationships (1)

Conrad Spouse Conrad's Husband
Witness refers to him as 'my husband' and 'faithful, good husband'.

Key Quotes (5)

"Chinese ones that explode on I-95."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009254.jpg
Quote #1
"What he was actually retired from was being a criminal, right?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009254.jpg
Quote #2
"He's been a very faithful, good husband."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009254.jpg
Quote #3
"Had it occurred to you when you were telling these lies that it was an odd way to start service as a juror, to lie to the Court?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009254.jpg
Quote #4
"I should have said that I know of. But no, you're correct."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009254.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,452 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 616-20 Filed 02/24/22 Page 32 of 67
A-5650
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,
February 15, 2012
[Page 161]
C2frdau5 Conrad - direct Page 161
1 Q. Had it occurred to you when you were telling these lies
2 that it was an odd way to start service as a juror, to lie to
3 the Court?
4 A. I don't know.
5 Q. You don't remember whether it occurred to you or not?
6 A. It's a weird question, sir.
7 Q. It's a weird answer, ma'am.
8 MR. OKULA: Objection, Judge.
9 THE COURT: Sustained. Please put a question to the
10 witness.
11 Q. Ma'am, was it a deliberate lie? Did you know you were
12 lying when you said it?
13 A. Yes.
14 Q. Then the judge asked you "Who are the other members of your
15 household?" You said, "I live with my husband. He's retired
16 at the present time," correct?
17 A. Yes.
18 Q. That was true, that you lived with your husband, correct?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. But you never lived with your husband at the address you
21 had given, correct?
22 A. I didn't give any address on voir dire.
23 Q. You never lived with your husband at your parents' house in
24 Bronxville, did you?
25 A. No, no.
[Page 162]
C2frdau5 Conrad - direct Page 162
1 Q. So, you created a false impression that you and your
2 husband owned a house there, correct?
3 A. I don't know what the judge's impression was.
4 Q. You were trying to create a false impression that you and
5 your husband were homeowners who owned a house and lived in
6 Bronxville, correct?
7 MR. OKULA: Objection, your Honor. I don't think
8 there is anything mentioned about a house there.
9 THE COURT: Overruled.
10 A. I don't know.
11 Q. You told the juror that he was retired, and the Court said,
12 "What is he retired from"?
13 A. Yes.
14 Q. You said he owned some bus companies?
15 A. Bus companies, yes.
16 Q. What bus companies does he own?
17 A. That was 30 years ago. My husband is 21 years older than I
18 am. Somewhere in Jersey.
19 Q. Do you know the name of a bus company?
20 A. Chinese ones that explode on I-95. I don't know. No, not
21 really.
22 Q. You said he owns some bus companies. Did he own any bus
23 companies at the time of the voir dire?
24 A. Oh, no, no.
25 Q. He had not owned any bus companies for some 30 years before
[Page 163]
C2frdau5 Conrad - direct Page 163
1 that date?
2 A. Maybe 25. I'm not really sure.
3 Q. What was the truthful answer to "What is he retired from,"
4 ma'am?
5 A. Being a businessman.
6 Q. When was the last time he was a businessman?
7 A. I guess maybe 20 years ago.
8 Q. What he was actually retired from was being a criminal,
9 right?
10 A. Please.
11 Q. Well --
12 A. I don't understand your question.
13 Q. What has your husband done since he left the New Jersey
14 penitentiary in 2004?
15 A. He's been a very faithful, good husband.
16 Q. Has he had a job?
17 A. No.
18 Q. Did you think that you were misleading the Court by saying,
19 in answer to the question "What is he retired from," "He owns
20 some bus companies"?
21 A. Owned.
22 Q. That's not what the transcript says. But let's say you
23 said "owned." Did you think you were misleading the Court when
24 the judge said, "What is he retired from?" and you said, "He
25 owned some bus companies"?
[Page 164]
C2frdau5 Conrad - direct Page 164
1 A. No, of course not.
2 Q. That wasn't misleading at all?
3 A. No.
4 Q. Did you apply that same standard of what is or is not
5 misleading in acquitting your function as a juror?
6 A. I don't really know what your question means.
7 Q. My question means you have an idea of what is misleading
8 and what is not misleading, right?
9 A. Of course.
10 Q. You think that what you said here about the bus companies
11 is not misleading, correct?
12 A. Not at all. Maybe it's a transcription, "own" or "owned."
13 That's it.
14 Q. In fact, did you apply that same standard in your mind of
15 what is or is not misleading in evaluating the evidence in this
16 case?
17 A. Of course we had to, and I had to, and I did.
18 Q. Then the Court asked you, "Do you work outside the home?"
19 And you answered, "No, I'm a stay-at-home wife," right?
20 A. Correct.
21 Q. Then the Court asked you, "Do you have any children," and
22 you said, "No."
23 A. I should have said that I know of. But no, you're correct.
24 Q. Then the judge said, "What is the highest level of
25 education you have attained?"
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS (41) Page 161 - Page 164
DOJ-OGR-00009254

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document