DOJ-OGR-00021598.jpg
530 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
530 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (related to Case 22-1426) involving the sentencing or fining of Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court overrules an objection regarding the inclusion of specific assets in the Presentence Investigation Report (PSR), specifically citing a $10 million bequest from Jeffrey Epstein to Maxwell. The Judge notes that despite Maxwell's claim of inability to pay, she had significant assets, including $3.8 million reported in July 2020.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the sentencing hearing regarding her ability to pay a fine and her assets.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, overruling objections regarding the PSR (Presentence Investigation Report).
|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Confirming the defense's assertion regarding Maxwell's inability to pay.
|
| Epstein | Deceased Associate |
Mentioned as the source of a $10 million bequest to Maxwell.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by footer stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2023-06-29
Court hearing (likely appeal record filing date, actual hearing earlier) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing and fines.
Southern District (Court)
Relationships (2)
$10 million bequest from Epstein to Maxwell mentioned by the Court.
Everdell speaks on behalf of the defense/Maxwell's interests.
Key Quotes (4)
"The uncertain assertion that she may lose the asset is not a basis to exclude it from a considered asset for purposes of determining a fine."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021598.jpg
Quote #1
"there is a $10 million bequest from Epstein this is in addition to other assets noted in the PSR."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021598.jpg
Quote #2
"I will say the assets and finances have been a moving target."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021598.jpg
Quote #3
"In July 2020, Ms. Maxwell reported $3.8 million in"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021598.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,558 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page168 of 217
SA-422
SA-422
53
M6SQmax1
1 information about the status of the estate. With respect to
2 whether this information should be in the PSR, I think the
3 Court is exactly right. This is listed as an asset on her
4 balance sheet. Whether she ultimately recovers that amount or
5 not, it's listed in the same way that liabilities are listed
6 even though it may be uncertain as to how those are resolved.
7 So I don't think the objection is founded.
8 THE COURT: Yes, I'm going to overrule this objection
9 to the PSR paragraph. It is included as an asset in
10 Ms. Maxwell's financial aid affidavit. The uncertain assertion
11 that she may lose the asset is not a basis to exclude it from a
12 considered asset for purposes of determining a fine.
13 Paragraph 178, the assertion here is that she is
14 unable to pay a fine.
15 Do I have that right, Mr. Everdell?
16 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.
17 THE COURT: I overrule the objection. Section
18 5E1.2(a) of the Guidelines requires the Court to impose a fine
19 in all cases except where the defendant establishes that she is
20 unable to pay and is not likely to become able to pay any fine.
21 The defendant has failed to establish this. As I just noted,
22 there is a $10 million bequest from Epstein this is in addition
23 to other assets noted in the PSR.
24 I will say the assets and finances have been a moving
25 target. In July 2020, Ms. Maxwell reported $3.8 million in
2 whether this information should be in the PSR, I think the
3 Court is exactly right. This is listed as an asset on her
4 balance sheet. Whether she ultimately recovers that amount or
5 not, it's listed in the same way that liabilities are listed
6 even though it may be uncertain as to how those are resolved.
7 So I don't think the objection is founded.
8 THE COURT: Yes, I'm going to overrule this objection
9 to the PSR paragraph. It is included as an asset in
10 Ms. Maxwell's financial aid affidavit. The uncertain assertion
11 that she may lose the asset is not a basis to exclude it from a
12 considered asset for purposes of determining a fine.
13 Paragraph 178, the assertion here is that she is
14 unable to pay a fine.
15 Do I have that right, Mr. Everdell?
16 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.
17 THE COURT: I overrule the objection. Section
18 5E1.2(a) of the Guidelines requires the Court to impose a fine
19 in all cases except where the defendant establishes that she is
20 unable to pay and is not likely to become able to pay any fine.
21 The defendant has failed to establish this. As I just noted,
22 there is a $10 million bequest from Epstein this is in addition
23 to other assets noted in the PSR.
24 I will say the assets and finances have been a moving
25 target. In July 2020, Ms. Maxwell reported $3.8 million in
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. ...
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021598
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document