HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023071.jpg

1.92 MB

Extraction Summary

2
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Financial research report / equity strategy note
File Size: 1.92 MB
Summary

This document is page 3 of a Bank of America Merrill Lynch equity strategy report dated January 29, 2017. It analyzes the potential stock market impact (S&P 500 EPS) of proposed corporate tax reforms by Donald Trump and House Speaker Paul Ryan. While the document contains the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023071', suggesting it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee (likely related to investigations involving Deutsche Bank or financial records), the text itself contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or specific illicit activities.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Donald Trump President (referenced)
Referenced regarding his tax reform proposals and 15% tax rate target.
Paul Ryan House Speaker (referenced)
Referenced regarding his 'Blueprint' tax proposal.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
Author of the financial report.
Congress
Mentioned regarding support for tax reform and 'deficit hawks'.
S&P
Referenced in the context of S&P 500 earnings analysis.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023071' indicating this document was part of a discovery production to th...

Timeline (1 events)

2017
Projected watershed year for tax reform.
United States

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied subject of US tax reform and US equity investors.

Relationships (1)

Donald Trump Political/Policy Comparison Paul Ryan
Report compares Trump's proposals against Ryan's Blueprint proposal.

Key Quotes (3)

"2017 could be a watershed year from a tax reform perspective."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023071.jpg
Quote #1
"Trump has continuously stated that tax reform is a priority, and there is evidence of widespread support in Congress."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023071.jpg
Quote #2
"We estimate that at the 20% tax rate, the Blueprint would be modestly accretive, the benefit would triple under Trump’s proposed 15% tax rate..."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023071.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,511 characters)

The costs and benefits of tax reform
2017 could be a watershed year from a tax reform perspective. Trump has continuously stated that tax reform is a priority, and there is evidence of widespread support in Congress. Tax reform could be enacted through reconciliation without the risk of being filibustered, suggesting the timing could be imminent. Corporate tax reform could have a significant impact on S&P 500 earnings, corporate behavior and capital markets. Much has been written on the timing, funding and process by which corporate tax reform could be enacted. In this report, we use House Speaker Paul Ryan’s Blueprint proposal as a starting point in quantifying the impact of corporate tax reform on the S&P 500, with some scenario analysis to account for differences included in the final bill (such as Trump’s proposals). Our analysis is focused specifically on the impact of corporate tax reform, however we recognize that there are many other factors that can impact the sensitivity analysis (e.g. changes to household income tax rates, infrastructure spending, etc.).
We estimate that the Blueprint proposal would initially boost S&P 500 EPS by $5-6, assuming the end of interest expense deductions only applies to new debt, or is phased in over time. But the devil is in the details. Over time, the loss of the interest tax shield would be a significant drag on earnings as existing debt is refinanced. Additionally, the corporate tax rate is critical in determining whether or not the tax reform policies end up being accretive to earnings on a sustained basis. We estimate that at the 20% tax rate, the Blueprint would be modestly accretive, the benefit would triple under Trump’s proposed 15% tax rate, but at a higher 25% tax rate that would appease the deficit hawks in Congress, the benefit would turn to a negative over time (Table 2). We also estimate a one-time $8-9 charge to GAAP EPS that would be associated with the discounted repatriation tax.
Table 2: Estimated impact of tax reform on S&P 500 2018 EPS
Tax policy | 15% | 20% | 25%
Tax rate change | 10.50 | 8.00 | 5.00
Ending interest deductibility – initial impact* | -0.50 to -1.00 | -0.50 to -1.50 | -0.50 to -2.00
Border adjustments | -4.00 | -5.50 | -6.50
Share count reduction from buybacks (50%) | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00
Total initial impact | 9.50 to 10.00 | 5.00 to 6.00 | 0.50 to 2.00
Ending interest deductibility – recurring impact | -3.50 | -5.00 | -6.00
Recurring impact | 7.00 | 1.50 | -3.50
One-time repatriation tax (8.75%), GAAP charge | -8.50 | -8.50 | -8.50
Source: BofAML US Equity & Quant Strategy, FactSet, Compustat, S&P
*Assumes end to interest deductibility only applies to new debt, where we estimate 70-90% of debt is long-term.
Note: For this exhibit, we assume that 100% of the cash is repatriated and 50% of it is spent on buybacks. For different buyback assumptions, please see the section on repatriation.
In the following pages, we focus on the following topics that have large implications for US equity investors, but it is important to consider corporate tax reform holistically rather than drawing major implications from each measure in isolation:
• Reducing the US corporate tax rate
• Repatriation - mandatory tax on overseas profits
• Border adjustment tax
• Removal of interest expense deduction
The government revenue associated with each of these is included in the table below.
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
Equity Strategy Focus Point | 29 January 2017
3
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023071

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document