This document is page 6 (labeled SA-375) of a court transcript from a sentencing hearing (likely Ghislaine Maxwell's given the attorneys involved). The Judge ('The Court') is addressing the 'factual accuracy' of the presentence report (PSR). Ms. Moe, representing the government, states they have no further objections, while Mr. Everdell, representing the defense, questions the procedure for addressing their 'substantial factual objections' and whether every discrepancy needs to be resolved.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor / Government Attorney |
Confirming the government has no continuing objections to the presentence report.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, managing the review of the presentence report.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Asking the court how they wish to proceed with factual discrepancies in the report.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| Government | ||
| DOJ |
"So we will turn first -- we'll set aside first the guideline calculation. We'll turn to the factual accuracy of the report."Source
"I did receive substantial factual objections to factual assertions in the report."Source
"Mr. Everdell, I know that you do have continuing objections."Source
"I don't know if the Court is planning on resolving each and every factual discrepancy or dispute..."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,386 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document