DOJ-OGR-00021551.jpg

495 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 495 KB
Summary

This document is page 6 (labeled SA-375) of a court transcript from a sentencing hearing (likely Ghislaine Maxwell's given the attorneys involved). The Judge ('The Court') is addressing the 'factual accuracy' of the presentence report (PSR). Ms. Moe, representing the government, states they have no further objections, while Mr. Everdell, representing the defense, questions the procedure for addressing their 'substantial factual objections' and whether every discrepancy needs to be resolved.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ms. Moe Prosecutor / Government Attorney
Confirming the government has no continuing objections to the presentence report.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the hearing, managing the review of the presentence report.
Mr. Everdell Defense Attorney
Asking the court how they wish to proceed with factual discrepancies in the report.

Organizations (3)

Timeline (1 events)

Unknown (Transcript date not in text)
Sentencing Hearing / Pre-sentencing argument
Southern District of New York (Implied by reporter name)

Relationships (3)

Ms. Moe Professional The Court
Addressed as 'your Honor'
Mr. Everdell Professional The Court
Addressed as 'your Honor'
Ms. Moe Adversarial Mr. Everdell
Opposing counsel (Government vs Defense)

Key Quotes (4)

"So we will turn first -- we'll set aside first the guideline calculation. We'll turn to the factual accuracy of the report."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021551.jpg
Quote #1
"I did receive substantial factual objections to factual assertions in the report."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021551.jpg
Quote #2
"Mr. Everdell, I know that you do have continuing objections."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021551.jpg
Quote #3
"I don't know if the Court is planning on resolving each and every factual discrepancy or dispute..."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00021551.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,386 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page121 of 217
SA-375
6
M6SQmax1
1 presentence report?
2 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
3 THE COURT: Thank you.
4 So we will turn first -- we'll set aside first the
5 guideline calculation. We'll turn to the factual accuracy of
6 the report. And I did receive substantial factual objections
7 to factual assertions in the report. I am prepared to go
8 through those with respect to any continuing factual objections
9 by the defense.
10 Let me confirm, Ms. Moe, does the government have any
11 objections to the report regarding factual accuracy?
12 MS. MOE: None, aside from those which are already
13 noted in the PSR.
14 THE COURT: No continuing objections.
15 MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor.
16 THE COURT: Mr. Everdell, I know that you do have
17 continuing objections. Tell me where you'd like to begin.
18 MR. EVERDELL: Well, your Honor, I don't know if the
19 Court is planning on resolving each and every factual
20 discrepancy or dispute or whether there are certain ones that
21 the court will find are relevant to sentencing or whether we
22 should go through each in detail.
23 THE COURT: I am prepared to -- what I typically do is
24 go through each one so that if there is a correction to the
25 report that is being requested to be made, whether it's
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. ...
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021551

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document