HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029551.jpg
1.8 MB
Extraction Summary
4
People
7
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
1.8 MB
Summary
This email chain from February 7, 2014, details an online reputation management strategy led by Tyler Shears for Jeffrey Epstein. Shears outlines an aggressive plan to manipulate Google search results to suppress negative coverage from Forbes and the NY Post by boosting 'high authority domains' and leveraging influence over publications like Harvard and National Geographic. The correspondence indicates direct communication between the consultant and Epstein regarding the timeline and strategy for 'cleaning up' his online presence.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Tyler Shears | Sender / Consultant |
Reputation management/SEO specialist working to manipulate search results for Jeffrey Epstein.
|
| Christina Galbraith | Recipient / Assistant |
Intermediary communicating with Shears; CC's Jeffrey Epstein on the correspondence.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject / Client |
Referenced as 'Mr. Epstein' and 'Jeffrey'. The client for whom the reputation management is being performed.
|
| Dr. Jeffrey M. Epstein, MD | Unrelated Entity |
Mentioned in the header snippet (Healthgrades), likely a search result artifact unrelated to the subject.
|
Organizations (7)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
|
Search engine whose algorithms are being targeted.
|
||
| Forbes |
Publication mentioned as having negative placements to be moved to the second page.
|
|
| NYPost |
Publication mentioned as having negative placements to be moved to the second page.
|
|
| Harvard |
Institution mentioned as a site they can provide reinforcement/influence from.
|
|
| Nat Geo |
Publication mentioned as a site they can provide reinforcement/influence from.
|
|
| Healthgrades |
Mentioned in the header snippet.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Source of the document (footer stamp).
|
Timeline (2 events)
January 10, 2014
Conversation regarding current status of reputation management.
Unknown
January 2014
Call between Tyler Shears and Mr. Epstein regarding limiting factors for moving Forbes/NYPost results.
Phone
Relationships (2)
Shears discusses strategy directly with Epstein and takes directives on timelines.
Galbraith facilitates communication and CCs Epstein on emails.
Key Quotes (5)
"The fresh piece needs to come out while we are dislodging the current results"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029551.jpg
Quote #1
"We are continuing to work aggressively to clean up results per our last call."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029551.jpg
Quote #2
"as soon as Forbes/NYPost are on second page they will begin a slow death"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029551.jpg
Quote #3
"From there we will see our properties shoot up due to the interlinking between them and the reinforcement we can provide from sites like Harvard, Nat Geo, and any other publications we have influence over."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029551.jpg
Quote #4
"Using the "short-term" links is one battle around other pages is just a part of the overall war..."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029551.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,471 characters)
Rating: 4.3 - 6 reviews
Visit Healthgrades for information on Dr. Jeffrey M. Epstein, MD. Find Phon
Visit Healthgrades for information on Dr. Jeffrey M. Epstein, MD. Find Phon
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Tyler Shears <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Thank you Christina - I tried your cell a few minutes ago and will be available on mine at your convenience. It is imperative we get a placement out by mid next week in order for us to hit the timeline I spoke to Mr. Epstein about.. The fresh piece needs to come out while we are dislodging the current results (as you are observing now).
Thank you Christina - I tried your cell a few minutes ago and will be available on mine at your convenience. It is imperative we get a placement out by mid next week in order for us to hit the timeline I spoke to Mr. Epstein about.. The fresh piece needs to come out while we are dislodging the current results (as you are observing now).
Mr. Epstein if you have any questions on current status vs. our conversation around Jan 10. please advise - We are continuing to work aggressively to clean up results per our last call. I am also available to discuss this at your convenience today or over weekend.
Sincerely,
Tyler Shears
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Christina Galbraith <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Hi Tyler,
Hi Tyler,
Ok thanks so much for the review. I've cc'd Jeffrey. I'll be in touch this afternoon.
Christina Galbraith
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
Begin forwarded message:
From: Tyler Shears <[REDACTED]>
Date: February 7, 2014 at 10:33:16 AM EST
To: Christina Galbraith <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Re: boosting strategy
Date: February 7, 2014 at 10:33:16 AM EST
To: Christina Galbraith <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Re: boosting strategy
We are pushing up the highest authority domains available for "Jeffrey Epstein" in general. I had reserved the approach of pushing non-website URLs for a few months because you expressed concern with making sure our URLs are on first page... but I had call w/ Mr. Epstein in the beginning of January and expressed that is a limiting factor for moving Forbes/NYPost as quickly as we'd like.
Getting up different types of results for different folks is required to dislodge the negative placements. Once they are dislodged it is much easier to restore our websites back to the rankings and have our "ideal" first page. The reason for this is Google tracks click data on results and as soon as Forbes/NYPost are on second page they will begin a slow death (less clicks on those, more clicks on the ones we have on first page)
From there we will see our properties shoot up due to the interlinking between them and the reinforcement we can provide from sites like Harvard, Nat Geo, and any other publications we have influence over. Using the "short-term" links is one battle around other pages is just a part of the overall war... You saw how Google was changing up much more dramatically when we had multiple Epstein's on the first page vs. having a saturated first page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029551
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document