DOJ-OGR-00019564.jpg
545 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / correspondence to judge
File Size:
545 KB
Summary
Page 2 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 17, 2020. The document discusses the handling of materials marked 'Confidential' by the government, with the defense (Maxwell) arguing that these are 'judicial documents' with a presumptive right of public access, citing Brown v. Maxwell. Large portions of the factual history and footnotes are redacted.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Recipient of the letter/filing ("The Honorable")
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant / Subject |
Objected to government's Confidential designation; seeks to provide material to judicial officers.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Second Circuit |
Court of Appeals referenced for legal precedence regarding 'judicial documents' and 'Confidential' definitions.
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution; marked materials as 'Confidential'.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (inferred from footer DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (2 events)
August 17, 2020
Submission of legal correspondence to Judge Nathan regarding confidential materials.
Court
Prior to August 17, 2020
Ms. Maxwell objected to the government's Confidential designation under paragraph 9 of the Protective Order.
N/A
Relationships (1)
Ms. Maxwell objected to the government's Confidential designation.
Key Quotes (4)
"The items to be referred to (and not filed) are confidential; accordingly, referring to them under seal in the Other Matters will not prejudice the government."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019564.jpg
Quote #1
"The Second Circuit has characterized these types of documents as "judicial documents" with a presumptive right of public access."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019564.jpg
Quote #2
"Ms. Maxwell objected to the government’s Confidential designation, under paragraph 9 of the Protective Order, and requested that the government withdraw the designation."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019564.jpg
Quote #3
"The Court does not need to decide the issue of whether the Material is confidential at this time given that Ms. Maxwell seeks only to provide the Material to judicial officers under seal"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019564.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,778 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 32 Filed 09/02/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 20-3060 Document 52-2 Filed 09/02/20 Page 115
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
August 17, 2020
Page 2
Case 20-3060 Document 52-2 Filed 09/02/20 Page 115
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
August 17, 2020
Page 2
[REDACTED]3 The items to be referred to (and not filed) are confidential;
accordingly, referring to them under seal in the Other Matters will not prejudice the government.
accordingly, referring to them under seal in the Other Matters will not prejudice the government.
Relevant Facts and Procedural History
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
__________________________________________________________________
3 The Materials to be filed are attached, under seal, as exhibits [REDACTED]. Although marked by the
government as "Confidential," the Materials are not "Confidential" as that term has been defined by the
Second Circuit. They consist of [REDACTED]
3 The Materials to be filed are attached, under seal, as exhibits [REDACTED]. Although marked by the
government as "Confidential," the Materials are not "Confidential" as that term has been defined by the
Second Circuit. They consist of [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] The Second Circuit has characterized these types of documents as "judicial documents" with
a presumptive right of public access. See Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 47 (2d Cir. 2019). Ms. Maxwell
objected to the government's Confidential designation, under paragraph 9 of the Protective Order, and
requested that the government withdraw the designation. The Court does not need to decide the issue of
whether the Material is confidential at this time given that Ms. Maxwell seeks only to provide the
Material to judicial officers under seal as information necessary to fairly decide pending issues in those
cases.
a presumptive right of public access. See Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 47 (2d Cir. 2019). Ms. Maxwell
objected to the government's Confidential designation, under paragraph 9 of the Protective Order, and
requested that the government withdraw the designation. The Court does not need to decide the issue of
whether the Material is confidential at this time given that Ms. Maxwell seeks only to provide the
Material to judicial officers under seal as information necessary to fairly decide pending issues in those
cases.
4
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
5
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
[REDACTED BLOCK OF TEXT]
App.105
DOJ-OGR-00019564
DOJ-OGR-00019564
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document