HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019671.jpg

1.71 MB

Extraction Summary

9
People
9
Organizations
5
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book page / investigative report (house oversight production)
File Size: 1.71 MB
Summary

This document is page 183 from a book (likely 'Epstein: Dead Men Tell No Tales' based on the filename metadata) included in a House Oversight production. The text details the timeline of intelligence leaks involving Edward Snowden, WikiLeaks, and The Intercept between 2013 and 2016, specifically focusing on NSA surveillance of French presidents and the DNC hacks. It discusses the potential involvement of Russian intelligence services in supplying documents to Julian Assange.

People (9)

Name Role Context
Edward Snowden Whistleblower/Source
Alleged source of NSA documents; supposedly wiped computer in Hong Kong.
Jacques Chirac Former President of France
Targeted by NSA surveillance.
Nicolas Sarkozy Former President of France
Targeted by NSA surveillance.
François Hollande President of France
Targeted by NSA surveillance.
Glenn Greenwald Journalist
Confirmed data limitations; suggested alternative NSA penetration sources to NYT.
Laura Poitras Journalist/Filmmaker
Partner of Greenwald; released documents via The Intercept.
Julian Assange WikiLeaks Founder
Published leaked documents; co-authored article; suspected contact with Snowden.
Vladimir Putin President of Russia
Denounced NATO war games near Russian border.
Sarah Harrison Assange's Deputy
Spent five months in Moscow with Snowden in 2013.

Organizations (9)

Name Type Context
WikiLeaks
Publisher of leaked documents.
NSA
National Security Agency; source of leaked intelligence.
The New York Times
Newspaper Greenwald spoke to.
Russian intelligence services
Suspected of obtaining documents and giving them to WikiLeaks.
NATO
Held war games near Russian border.
Democratic National Committee
Files stolen and released in July 2016.
The Intercept
Web publication run by Greenwald and Poitras.
Israeli military
Subject of an NSA intercept regarding a raid in Syria.
U.S. intelligence
Suspected Russian involvement in DNC leaks.

Timeline (3 events)

2013
Sarah Harrison spent five months in Moscow with Snowden.
Moscow
August 1
Israeli raid in Syria (year implied as pre-2015 based on release date context).
Syria
June 2015
NATO war games held near Russian border.
Near Russian border

Locations (5)

Location Context
Location where Sarah Harrison stayed with Snowden.
Location where Snowden supposedly wiped his computer.
Country whose presidents were targeted.
Location of Israeli military raid.
Location of NATO war games.

Relationships (3)

Julian Assange Professional/Contact Edward Snowden
Assange had been in telephonic contact with Snowden in Hong Kong.
Sarah Harrison Associate/Support Edward Snowden
Spent five months in Moscow with Snowden in 2013.
Glenn Greenwald Professional Partners Laura Poitras
Co-founders of The Intercept; released documents together.

Key Quotes (3)

"Greenwald suggested to The New York Times that it might have been stolen by another penetration in the NSA, presumably one who had access to the same secret compartments as Snowden in 2013."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019671.jpg
Quote #1
"U.S. intelligence strongly suspected they been stolen by the Russian intelligence services and sent to WikiLeaks."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019671.jpg
Quote #2
"Russia made use of Assange and WikiLeaks to exploit selected fruits of its espionage activities"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019671.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,483 characters)

The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 183
Moscow that were more embarrassing to America. In June 2015, the
WikiLeaks website released another putative Snowden document,
two years after he had supposedly wiped his computer clean in Hong
Kong. It revealed that the NSA had targeted the telephones of three
consecutive presidents of France—Jacques Chirac, Nicolas Sarkozy,
and François Hollande.
According to a former NSA official, this document, like the 2013
Merkel material, was not among the data on the thumb drive given
to journalists in Hong Kong, which Greenwald confirmed. Green-
wald suggested to The New York Times that it might have been sto-
len by another penetration in the NSA, presumably one who had
access to the same secret compartments as Snowden in 2013. Since
Greenwald and Poitras had no way of knowing about the documents
that Snowden did not give them, it is equally possible that the Rus-
sian intelligence services obtained this document from Snowden and
later gave it to WikiLeaks. The release on Assange’s WikiLeaks site
came in the midst of NATO war games held near the Russian border,
which Putin had vehemently denounced. The accompanying article
was co-authored by Assange, who now claimed to have access to
Snowden’s NSA material. Because Assange had been in telephonic
contact with Snowden in Hong Kong, and his deputy, Sarah Har-
rison, had spent five months in Moscow with Snowden in 2013, it
is certainly possible Snowden was his source. But it seems difficult
to believe that Assange waited two years before publishing because
he has made it part of his modus operandi to publish documents
immediately. Because WikiLeaks receives documents anonymously
via its Tor software, any party with access to the Snowden files
could have sent it. Subsequently, in July 2016, Assange released via
WikiLeaks a cache of politically disruptive documents from the files
of the Democratic National Committee. U.S. intelligence strongly
suspected they been stolen by the Russian intelligence services and
sent to WikiLeaks. If so, Russia made use of Assange and WikiLeaks
to exploit selected fruits of its espionage activities
Greenwald and Poitras also released belated documents. On
July 15, 2015, their web publication, The Intercept, released a
Snowden document that cited an NSA intercept of an Israeli mili-
tary communication concerning an Israeli raid in Syria on August 1,
Epst_9780451494566_2p_all_r1.z.indd 183
9/29/16 5:51 PM
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019671

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document