This document is a page from a court transcript (Summation by defense attorney Ms. Menninger) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the witness 'Jane' originally had no memory of abuse in New Mexico in 2019 but fabricated or recovered a memory after being pressured by the government four times, characterizing this as 'suggestion.' The defense also highlights that Jane testified she does not recall ever being alone in a room with both Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein during the abuse.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Speaker delivering the closing argument (summation).
|
| Jane | Witness / Victim (Pseudonym) |
Accuser whose memory and testimony regarding New Mexico is being challenged.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Referred to as 'Ghislaine'; the defense argues she was not placed in the room during the abuse by the witness's testi...
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Alleged Perpetrator |
Mentioned in relation to the abuse and being in the room.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Accused by the defense of using suggestion to recover memories from the witness.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by footer stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where the government sought to establish abuse occurred to prove transportation across state lines.
|
|
|
Where Jane testified she was taken for abuse.
|
"That's not how memory works. That's suggestion."Source
"Jane told you, told the government repeatedly, she had no specific recollection of abuse in New Mexico."Source
"after they asked her four times, she suddenly got back a memory of abuse in New Mexico"Source
"she does not recall if she was ever alone in the room with Ghislaine and Jeffrey for any of the abuse."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,631 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document