This document is a page from a government legal filing dated April 26, 2023, regarding the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). The government attorney outlines the complexity of Maxwell's appeal—which raises issues including Epstein's nonprosecution agreement and juror misconduct—and requests a 30-day extension and a word count allowance (over 20,000 words) to adequately respond, citing a scheduling conflict with another trial.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Appellant/Defendant |
Filed an opening brief on appeal raising five legal issues.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Deceased Co-conspirator |
Mentioned regarding a nonprosecution agreement signed with the U.S. Attorney's Office.
|
| Unnamed Government Attorney | Author/Counsel |
Refers to self as 'I', the attorney with primary responsibility for drafting the Government response brief.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida |
Signed a nonprosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein.
|
|
| District Court |
The lower court whose decisions are being appealed by Maxwell.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by footer DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the U.S. Attorney's Office that signed the Epstein NPA.
|
"Maxwell’s brief raises at least five issues: (1) whether the indictment should have been dismissed pursuant to a nonprosecution agreement signed by Jeffrey Epstein..."Source
"Although the Government is endeavoring to limit the size of its brief, a complete and useful response to Maxwell’s brief cannot reasonably be accomplished in fewer than 20,000 words."Source
"The Government is requesting the 30-day extension due to an unavoidable scheduling conflict."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,584 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document