This page is a transcript from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on 01/15/25. It features the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz regarding the witness's academic credentials at Brown University and their expertise in traumatic stress and childhood trauma. During the testimony, Government Exhibit 1 is admitted into evidence without objection from the defense attorney, Mr. Pagliuca.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rocchio | Witness |
Under direct examination, discussing academic qualifications and published work regarding trauma.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Government Attorney (Prosecution) |
Questioning the witness and offering Government Exhibit 1.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing and admitting evidence.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Stating no objection to the admission of Government Exhibit 1.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brown University |
Employer of the witness (Rocchio), where they received a promotion.
|
|
| Rhode Island Psychological Association |
Organization for which the witness wrote newsletter articles.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting firm listed in the footer.
|
|
| Government |
Referring to the prosecution offering the exhibit.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location associated with the Psychological Association mentioned.
|
"It does, although it doesn't reflect my recent promotion at Brown from clinical instructor to clinical assistant professor."Source
"My published work generally deals in some way with traumatic stress, ethics, and professional practice issues."Source
"a recent article was looking at the forensic assessment of individuals who have experienced complex trauma, childhood trauma, severe and repeated childhood trauma."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,365 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document