DOJ-OGR-00016761.jpg
613 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
613 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Mr. Everdell argues to the Court that the lack of corroborating documentary evidence, specifically phone records and emails, is due to the age of the allegations (dating back to the 1990s) when such technology was not widely used. The discussion focuses on formulating questions to an agent regarding this absence of evidence.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Speaking to the court, arguing about the absence of evidence due to the timeframe of the allegations.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, asking Everdell for examples of questions regarding emails.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned by Everdell regarding witnesses who testified against her.
|
| Accusing Witnesses | Witnesses |
Individuals who testified against Ms. Maxwell regarding events in the 1990s.
|
| The Agent | Law Enforcement/Witness |
Referenced as the person to whom the absence of evidence would be raised.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Inferred from footer stamp DOJ-OGR
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY), implied by court reporter name and case number format.
|
Relationships (2)
Everdell is arguing the defense case regarding evidence against Maxwell.
Witnesses 'testified against Ms. Maxwell'.
Key Quotes (4)
"There is no phone records."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016761.jpg
Quote #1
"The main reason for that is that the age of the case, especially the allegations in the 1990s are quite old and these records don't exist anymore."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016761.jpg
Quote #2
"Because, in fact, in the 1990s, nobody used email, it wasn't very popular, it was just starting, yes."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016761.jpg
Quote #3
"So because the allegations are over 25 years old, there are no emails in this case from that period..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016761.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,699 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 32 of 197 2573
LCFCmax1
LCFCmax1
1 of the case. There is no phone records. There is no -- there
2 is lots of things that you might expect to be part of the case
3 that are not here. The main reason for that is that the age of
4 the case, especially the allegations in the 1990s are quite old
5 and these records don't exist anymore. So I think it's fair to
6 raise to the agent the absence of evidence, that evidence
7 through the agent. That's one topic.
8 THE COURT: So, for example, give me your example
9 question on emails.
10 MR. EVERDELL: It's in here somewhere, your Honor. As
11 part of your investigating the case, you tried to gather as
12 much documentary evidence as you can to corroborate what the
13 witnesses are telling you, isn't that right. I imagine the
14 answer is going to be yes to that. And given the age of the
15 case, there were no emails from the 1990s, there are
16 allegations in this case from the 1990s, correct, yeah. There
17 are no emails that you have for any of the accusing witnesses
18 who testified against Ms. Maxwell from the 1990s, is that
19 right, yes. Because, in fact, in the 1990s, nobody used email,
20 it wasn't very popular, it was just starting, yes. So because
21 the allegations are over 25 years old, there are no emails in
22 this case from that period, isn't that right, yes, there is no
23 emails. Same thing about phone --
24 THE COURT: I'm sorry. I cut you off, Mr. Everdell.
25 Same thing about phone records?
2 is lots of things that you might expect to be part of the case
3 that are not here. The main reason for that is that the age of
4 the case, especially the allegations in the 1990s are quite old
5 and these records don't exist anymore. So I think it's fair to
6 raise to the agent the absence of evidence, that evidence
7 through the agent. That's one topic.
8 THE COURT: So, for example, give me your example
9 question on emails.
10 MR. EVERDELL: It's in here somewhere, your Honor. As
11 part of your investigating the case, you tried to gather as
12 much documentary evidence as you can to corroborate what the
13 witnesses are telling you, isn't that right. I imagine the
14 answer is going to be yes to that. And given the age of the
15 case, there were no emails from the 1990s, there are
16 allegations in this case from the 1990s, correct, yeah. There
17 are no emails that you have for any of the accusing witnesses
18 who testified against Ms. Maxwell from the 1990s, is that
19 right, yes. Because, in fact, in the 1990s, nobody used email,
20 it wasn't very popular, it was just starting, yes. So because
21 the allegations are over 25 years old, there are no emails in
22 this case from that period, isn't that right, yes, there is no
23 emails. Same thing about phone --
24 THE COURT: I'm sorry. I cut you off, Mr. Everdell.
25 Same thing about phone records?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016761
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document