DOJ-OGR-00019405.jpg

602 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
5
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document / court filing
File Size: 602 KB
Summary

This page outlines the statement of the case and facts regarding Ms. Maxwell, detailing a six-count superseding indictment involving conspiracy with Jeffrey Epstein and perjury. It also summarizes the background of the civil defamation case Giuffre v. Maxwell, which was settled and dismissed in 2017.

People (3)

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Government
S.D.N.Y

Timeline (5 events)

Superseding indictment
April 2016 deposition
July 2016 deposition
Settlement of Giuffre v. Maxwell
Dismissal of case in May 2017

Locations (1)

Location Context

Relationships (2)

Key Quotes (3)

"untrue"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019405.jpg
Quote #1
"obvious lies"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019405.jpg
Quote #2
"sexually abused and trafficked"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019405.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,336 characters)

Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page6 of 58
Statement of the Case and the Facts
The indictment.
In a superseding indictment, the government alleges that Ms. Maxwell:
conspired with Jeffrey Epstein to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts
(Count 1); enticed a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts (Count 2);
conspired with Epstein to transport minors with the intent to engage in criminal
sexual activity (Count 3); transported a minor with the intent to engage in criminal
sexual activity (Count 4); committed perjury in the April 2016 deposition in Giuffre
v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433 (S.D.N.Y) (Count 5); and committed perjury in the July
2016 deposition in Giuffre v. Maxwell (Count 6). App. 13–30.
The civil case.
Giuffre v. Maxwell is a long-dismissed defamation case in which Virginia L.
Giuffre alleged that Ms. Maxwell defamed her. The alleged defamation centered on
a statement from Ms. Maxwell’s attorney-hired press agent generally denying as
“untrue” and “obvious lies” plaintiff’s numerous allegations, over the span of four
years, that Ms. Maxwell participated in a scheme causing her to be “sexually
abused and trafficked” by Epstein. The case settled after discovery and before trial,
and the district court dismissed the case with prejudice in May 2017.
1
DOJ-OGR-00019405

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document