DOJ-OGR-00005786.jpg
378 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing (table of contents)
File Size:
378 KB
Summary
This document is the Table of Contents (page 2 of the brief, page 3 of the PDF) for a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines legal arguments by the Government opposing Defense motions, specifically concerning the identification of the defendant by 'Minor Victim-4', the admission of government exhibits, and the use of the terms 'Victims' and 'Rape' during the trial.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Minor Victim-4 | Victim/Witness |
Subject of a suppression motion regarding identification of the defendant.
|
| Defendant | Defendant |
Subject of identification by Minor Victim-4 (Case context implies Ghislaine Maxwell).
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00005786
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution team responding to defense motions
|
|
| The Defense |
Legal team for the defendant filed motions being argued against
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-10-29
Filing of Document 397 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Court
Government
Defense
Relationships (1)
Header V: 'Minor Victim-4’s Identification of the Defendant'
Key Quotes (4)
"There is No Basis to Suppress Minor Victim-4’s Identification of the Defendant"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005786.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court Should Deny the Defense Motions to Preclude the Government’s Exhibits"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005786.jpg
Quote #2
"There is No Basis to Preclude Discussion of “Victims” or Rape"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005786.jpg
Quote #3
"The Remaining Defense Motions are Aimed at Evidence the Government Does Not Plan to Elicit"Source
DOJ-OGR-00005786.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,771 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 397 Filed 10/29/21 Page 3 of 84
V. There is No Basis to Suppress Minor Victim-4’s Identification of the Defendant ........................ 63
A. Background ........................................................................................................................ 63
B. Applicable Law .................................................................................................................. 65
C. Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 67
VI. The Court Should Deny the Defense Motions to Preclude the Government’s Exhibits ................. 71
A. Applicable Law................................................................................................................... 71
B. Discussion.......................................................................................................................... 72
VII. There is No Basis to Preclude Discussion of “Victims” or Rape................................................. 76
A. References to Victims ........................................................................................................ 76
B. Evidence of Rape................................................................................................................ 79
VIII. The Remaining Defense Motions are Aimed at Evidence the Government Does Not Plan to Elicit
....................................................................................................................................................81
CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................... 83
A. Background ........................................................................................................................ 63
B. Applicable Law .................................................................................................................. 65
C. Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 67
VI. The Court Should Deny the Defense Motions to Preclude the Government’s Exhibits ................. 71
A. Applicable Law................................................................................................................... 71
B. Discussion.......................................................................................................................... 72
VII. There is No Basis to Preclude Discussion of “Victims” or Rape................................................. 76
A. References to Victims ........................................................................................................ 76
B. Evidence of Rape................................................................................................................ 79
VIII. The Remaining Defense Motions are Aimed at Evidence the Government Does Not Plan to Elicit
....................................................................................................................................................81
CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................... 83
2
DOJ-OGR-00005786
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document