DOJ-OGR-00010117.jpg
443 KB
Extraction Summary
9
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
443 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (likely from the Daugerdas case, referenced in Epstein/Maxwell filings regarding juror misconduct precedents). The defense (Parse, Field) and the government rest their cases in an evidentiary hearing. The Judge requests post-hearing briefs specifically addressing whether attorneys for the firm Brune & Richard satisfied ethical obligations regarding the disclosure of a 'July 21 letter' and an investigation into 'Juror No. 1'.
People (9)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, issuing instructions for briefs.
|
| Parse | Defendant |
Defendant resting their case.
|
| Mr. Shechtman | Attorney |
Attorney representing Parse.
|
| Ms. McCarthy | Attorney |
Attorney representing Mr. Field.
|
| Mr. Field | Defendant |
Defendant mentioned by Ms. McCarthy.
|
| Mr. Rotert | Attorney |
Attorney confirming no further evidence.
|
| Mr. Sklarsky | Attorney |
Attorney confirming no further evidence.
|
| Mr. Okula | Government Attorney |
Representing the government, confirms the government rests.
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
Subject of an investigation mentioned by the Court regarding ethical disclosure obligations.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune & Richard |
Law firm whose attorneys' ethical obligations are being questioned regarding disclosure.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting service.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by DOJ-OGR stamp).
|
Timeline (1 events)
Unknown (Transcript Date)
Evidentiary Hearing
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction implied by the court reporters' name (likely SDNY).
|
Relationships (3)
Mr. Shechtman answers for Defendant Parse.
Ms. McCarthy answers for Mr. Field.
Mr. Okula answers for the government.
Key Quotes (3)
"Does the defendant Parse rest?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00010117.jpg
Quote #1
"We do, your Honor."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010117.jpg
Quote #2
"I'd like the question of whether the attorneys for Brune & Richard involved in this matter would have satisfied their ethical obligations if they failed to disclose the contents of the July 21 letter and their complete investigation into Juror No. 1."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010117.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,445 characters)
Case 1:20-cv-00888-DAB Document 646-8 Filed 08/24/22 Page 18 of 17
A-5834
A-5834
377
C2grdau4
1 THE COURT: Does the defendant Parse rest?
2 MR. SHECHTMAN: We do, your Honor.
3 THE COURT: Does any defendant have any additional
4 evidence to offer to the Court on this hearing?
5 MS. MCCARTHY: Not from Mr. Field, your Honor.
6 MR. ROTERT: We do not, your Honor.
7 MR. SKLARSKY: No, your Honor.
8 THE COURT: Does the government have anything further?
9 MR. OKULA: Thank you, your Honor. We do not.
10 THE COURT: The government rests?
11 MR. OKULA: We do indeed, your Honor.
12 THE COURT: I would like to get some post-hearing
13 briefing from the parties. It seems to me that the simplest
14 way to do it would be to have the parties submit simultaneous
15 briefs and then I give you a very short responsive brief if you
16 felt it was necessary to respond to something that the other
17 side said. We'll fix a schedule in a moment.
18 Obviously, in the briefs I want the parties to provide
19 the Court with what they believe the strongest results are of
20 this evidentiary hearing. Second, in the post-hearing briefs
21 I'd like the question of whether the attorneys for Brune &
22 Richard involved in this matter would have satisfied their
23 ethical obligations if they failed to disclose the contents of
24 the July 21 letter and their complete investigation into Juror
25 No. 1.
C2grdau4
1 THE COURT: Does the defendant Parse rest?
2 MR. SHECHTMAN: We do, your Honor.
3 THE COURT: Does any defendant have any additional
4 evidence to offer to the Court on this hearing?
5 MS. MCCARTHY: Not from Mr. Field, your Honor.
6 MR. ROTERT: We do not, your Honor.
7 MR. SKLARSKY: No, your Honor.
8 THE COURT: Does the government have anything further?
9 MR. OKULA: Thank you, your Honor. We do not.
10 THE COURT: The government rests?
11 MR. OKULA: We do indeed, your Honor.
12 THE COURT: I would like to get some post-hearing
13 briefing from the parties. It seems to me that the simplest
14 way to do it would be to have the parties submit simultaneous
15 briefs and then I give you a very short responsive brief if you
16 felt it was necessary to respond to something that the other
17 side said. We'll fix a schedule in a moment.
18 Obviously, in the briefs I want the parties to provide
19 the Court with what they believe the strongest results are of
20 this evidentiary hearing. Second, in the post-hearing briefs
21 I'd like the question of whether the attorneys for Brune &
22 Richard involved in this matter would have satisfied their
23 ethical obligations if they failed to disclose the contents of
24 the July 21 letter and their complete investigation into Juror
25 No. 1.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010117
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document