DOJ-OGR-00002361.jpg
502 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court motion
File Size:
502 KB
Summary
This document is page 9 (filed as page 14 of 23) of a legal filing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It discusses David Boies' frustration that the government initially failed to pursue perjury charges against Maxwell despite his belief they had her 'dead to rights.' The filing argues that a redacted individual (likely a judge, referred to as 'she') modified a protective order based on misrepresentations made by an Assistant U.S. Attorney. A large portion of the page is redacted.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of perjury charge; defense team filed this document.
|
| David Boies | Attorney (Plaintiffs) |
Quoted expressing frustration that the government had not pursued perjury charges against Maxwell earlier.
|
| Assistant U.S. Attorney | Prosecutor |
Accused of making misrepresentations which a redacted individual (likely a judge) relied upon.
|
| [Redacted Female Figure] | Judge (Implied) |
Referred to as 'she'; relied on AUSA's misrepresentations; modified a Protective Order.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
US Prosecution/DOJ; accused of misrepresentations and inaction regarding perjury charges.
|
|
| Chemical Bank |
Referenced in a legal citation regarding a subpoena case.
|
|
| DOJ-OGR |
Department of Justice - Office of Government Information Services (indicated by Bates stamp).
|
Timeline (2 events)
Relationships (2)
Boies wanted to pursue perjury charges against her.
Government subsequently charged perjury counts.
Key Quotes (4)
"Boies 'was particularly frustrated by the failure to pursue a perjury charge [against Maxwell]'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002361.jpg
Quote #1
"'We have her dead to rights.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002361.jpg
Quote #2
"In making this finding, [REDACTED] relied on the Assistant U.S. Attorney’s misrepresentations"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002361.jpg
Quote #3
"Ms. Maxwell strenuously disagrees with Mr. Boies’ comments."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002361.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,087 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 14 of 23
At that time, however, the government did not act. Boies “was particularly frustrated by
the failure to pursue a perjury charge [against Maxwell],” reported one person, who recalled him
saying, “We have her dead to rights.”⁵ Id. All of this contradicts The government’s
representations to [REDACTED], who specifically [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
the failure to pursue a perjury charge [against Maxwell],” reported one person, who recalled him
saying, “We have her dead to rights.”⁵ Id. All of this contradicts The government’s
representations to [REDACTED], who specifically [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Reassured by the government that [REDACTED] modified
the Protective Order so that [REDACTED] could comply with the subpoena. Ex. F.
[REDACTED] found that [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]. In making this finding, [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] relied on the Assistant U.S. Attorney’s misrepresentations, and she [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] from the subpoena at issue in Chemical Bank. Said
[REDACTED]
the Protective Order so that [REDACTED] could comply with the subpoena. Ex. F.
[REDACTED] found that [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]. In making this finding, [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] relied on the Assistant U.S. Attorney’s misrepresentations, and she [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] from the subpoena at issue in Chemical Bank. Said
[REDACTED]
[LARGE BLOCK REDACTION]
Ex. G, p 21.
__________________________________________________________________
⁵ Ms. Maxwell strenuously disagrees with Mr. Boies’ comments. We reference them here only to
show their connection to the perjury counts that the government subsequently charged.
⁵ Ms. Maxwell strenuously disagrees with Mr. Boies’ comments. We reference them here only to
show their connection to the perjury counts that the government subsequently charged.
9
DOJ-OGR-00002361
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document