DOJ-OGR-00018885.jpg
558 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
558 KB
Summary
This document is page 23 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The dialogue involves a debate between the prosecution (Mr. Rohrbach) and defense (Ms. Sternheim) regarding the admissibility of 'record 824' and the implications of testimony provided by Juan Alessi concerning the year 2001. The proceedings are paused by the Judge to wait for a juror experiencing train issues.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, making rulings on evidence admissibility and managing court schedule.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney (Prosecution/Government) |
Discussing legal precedents (case starting with 'L') and business records (Exhibit 824).
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney (Defense) |
Arguing against inferences made from Mr. Alessi's testimony regarding employment and location of a child.
|
| Ms. Gill | Witness/Subject |
Person whom Mr. Rohrbach needs to ask about reliance on a record.
|
| Mr. Alessi | Witness |
Testified regarding the year 2001; referenced by Ms. Sternheim.
|
| Unidentified Juror | Juror |
Causing a delay due to 'substantial train issues'.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (inferred from footer DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (2 events)
2001
2022-08-10
Court hearing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell)
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case formatting.
|
Relationships (2)
Arguing different sides of an evidentiary issue in court.
Sternheim references Alessi's previous testimony.
Key Quotes (3)
"We'll leave the fact finding to the jury."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018885.jpg
Quote #1
"We'll still have to wait for our juror who had substantial train issues."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018885.jpg
Quote #2
"the fact that someone may be employed is not a basis for an inference that a child of that employee was at a certain location at a certain time"Source
DOJ-OGR-00018885.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,410 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 23 of 262 1728
LC8Cmax1
LC8Cmax1
1 sure?
2 MR. ROHRBACH: It's in the matter of -- it starts with
3 an L. I can't give the cite off the top of my head. I wasn't
4 expecting this particular argument today.
5 THE COURT: If that theory applies for the content of
6 824, I'll consider it, so you'll let me know.
7 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor. I just haven't asked
8 Ms. Gill about their reliance on this record, which is similar
9 to the questions the Court has been asking for, so I couldn't
10 articulate that theory of a business record for 824 right now.
11 THE COURT: Right. Sounds like a similar --
12 MS. STERNHEIM: Just to close the loop, with regard to
13 the Court's statement that it was a relevant time period, it's
14 my recollection that Mr. Alessi testified to 2001, and the fact
15 that someone may be employed is not a basis for an inference
16 that a child of that employee was at a certain location at a
17 certain time, which is why the government is seeking to
18 introduce that.
19 THE COURT: We'll leave the fact finding to the jury.
20 MS. STERNHEIM: Okay.
21 THE COURT: Thank you.
22 MR. ROHRBACH: Thank you, your Honor.
23 THE COURT: Anything else? We'll still have to wait
24 for our juror who had substantial train issues. So we will
25 wait. I'll step down. Thank you.
2 MR. ROHRBACH: It's in the matter of -- it starts with
3 an L. I can't give the cite off the top of my head. I wasn't
4 expecting this particular argument today.
5 THE COURT: If that theory applies for the content of
6 824, I'll consider it, so you'll let me know.
7 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor. I just haven't asked
8 Ms. Gill about their reliance on this record, which is similar
9 to the questions the Court has been asking for, so I couldn't
10 articulate that theory of a business record for 824 right now.
11 THE COURT: Right. Sounds like a similar --
12 MS. STERNHEIM: Just to close the loop, with regard to
13 the Court's statement that it was a relevant time period, it's
14 my recollection that Mr. Alessi testified to 2001, and the fact
15 that someone may be employed is not a basis for an inference
16 that a child of that employee was at a certain location at a
17 certain time, which is why the government is seeking to
18 introduce that.
19 THE COURT: We'll leave the fact finding to the jury.
20 MS. STERNHEIM: Okay.
21 THE COURT: Thank you.
22 MR. ROHRBACH: Thank you, your Honor.
23 THE COURT: Anything else? We'll still have to wait
24 for our juror who had substantial train issues. So we will
25 wait. I'll step down. Thank you.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018885
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document