DOJ-OGR-00018815.jpg
569 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
569 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. The text captures a legal debate between attorneys Ms. Comey and Mr. Pagliuca before the Judge regarding the admissibility of specific testimony or evidence (items 20 and 21). The discussion focuses on whether seeing a female naked in a massage room before Jeffrey Epstein entered constitutes 'lewd and lascivious conduct' or mere nudity.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Name appearing in the header 'Carolyn - cross', indicating she is the witness under cross-examination.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject |
Mentioned by Ms. Comey regarding testimony that a female would be naked before he entered the room.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
Defense attorney arguing regarding the admissibility of items 20 and 21.
|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney |
Prosecutor clarifying testimony regarding what was seen in the massage room.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the objections and rulings (Judge Paul A. Engelmayer based on case number PAE).
|
| Unidentified Female ('She/Her') | Subject of Testimony |
The person described as being naked in the massage room.
|
| Other Males | Hypothetical/Mentioned |
Mentioned by the Court regarding potential presence during conduct.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, referenced in the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00018815.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
Court filing date for the transcript document.
Southern District of New York (implied by case number)
Unknown (Past)
Incident described in testimony where a female was naked in a massage room before Jeffrey Epstein entered.
Massage Room
Jeffrey Epstein
Unidentified Female
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Specific room where the testimony describes a female being naked before Epstein entered.
|
Relationships (1)
Testimony describes her waiting naked in a massage room for Epstein to enter.
Key Quotes (4)
"I think there was testimony that she would be naked for a period before Jeffrey Epstein would come in"Source
DOJ-OGR-00018815.jpg
Quote #1
"it would just be them seeing her nude in the room is what the testimony was, not lewd and lascivious conduct."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018815.jpg
Quote #2
"There's the inference available of inconsistency, so I'll allow 20."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018815.jpg
Quote #3
"21 is simply asking a description of the lewd and lascivious exhibition, the date, and whether you received money or other consideration. Answer, none."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018815.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,434 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 217 of 264 1658
LC7VMAX7 Carolyn - cross
LC7VMAX7 Carolyn - cross
1 that they saw her naked. There was no other color on it.
2 There was no suggestion that they were engaged in sex acts or
3 that they were naked. I have the same objection.
4 THE COURT: I'm going to overrule on that one, 20.
5 There's the inference available of inconsistency, so I'll allow
6 20.
7 Next.
8 MR. PAGLIUCA: 21 is a description --
9 THE COURT: Just to spell that out, on the theory that
10 other males present in the room during conduct described could
11 be deemed lewd and lascivious conduct.
12 MS. COMEY: I just want to be clear, your Honor, that
13 the description was that they saw her naked in the massage
14 room, not that they saw her during any of the conduct. I think
15 there was testimony that she would be naked for a period before
16 Jeffrey Epstein would come in; and so it would just be them
17 seeing her nude in the room is what the testimony was, not lewd
18 and lascivious conduct.
19 THE COURT: Well, I'm going to overrule on 20.
20 Go ahead.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: 21 is simply asking a description of
22 the lewd and lascivious exhibition, the date, and whether you
23 received money or other consideration. Answer, none.
24 THE COURT: Okay. Exhibition we did not get testimony
25 on, so I'll sustain. There's no inconsistency on 21. No
2 There was no suggestion that they were engaged in sex acts or
3 that they were naked. I have the same objection.
4 THE COURT: I'm going to overrule on that one, 20.
5 There's the inference available of inconsistency, so I'll allow
6 20.
7 Next.
8 MR. PAGLIUCA: 21 is a description --
9 THE COURT: Just to spell that out, on the theory that
10 other males present in the room during conduct described could
11 be deemed lewd and lascivious conduct.
12 MS. COMEY: I just want to be clear, your Honor, that
13 the description was that they saw her naked in the massage
14 room, not that they saw her during any of the conduct. I think
15 there was testimony that she would be naked for a period before
16 Jeffrey Epstein would come in; and so it would just be them
17 seeing her nude in the room is what the testimony was, not lewd
18 and lascivious conduct.
19 THE COURT: Well, I'm going to overrule on 20.
20 Go ahead.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: 21 is simply asking a description of
22 the lewd and lascivious exhibition, the date, and whether you
23 received money or other consideration. Answer, none.
24 THE COURT: Okay. Exhibition we did not get testimony
25 on, so I'll sustain. There's no inconsistency on 21. No
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018815
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document