This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorney argues that Maxwell had her own wealth and connections (referencing hunting photos in the U.K.) and did not rely on Epstein for her lifestyle, challenging the prosecution's motive theory. The defense compares Maxwell to Eva Dubin, noting that Dubin dated Epstein for a decade and saw nothing abnormal, implying Maxwell's association should not automatically imply guilt.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Delivering the closing summation argument to the jury.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the argument; defense claims she had her own connections and did not need Epstein for lifestyle.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Associate/Co-conspirator |
Mentioned regarding his relationship with Maxwell and Dubin.
|
| Eva Dubin | Witness/Associate |
Mentioned as a comparator; dated Epstein for a decade, saw nothing abnormal, and let her kids around him.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Criticized by the defense for not providing context on Maxwell's life before/after Epstein.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in footer.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where Maxwell was pictured hunting with dogs.
|
"maybe it was Jeffrey that needed Ghislaine and her connections and not the other way around."Source
"And does that motive even make sense for a woman in her 30s, that she needs this lifestyle, so she's just willing to drag 14-year-olds in for sexual abuse?"Source
"She [Eva Dubin] dated Jeffrey Epstein for a decade. She saw nothing abnormal. She let her kids hang around with Jeffrey Epstein."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,595 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document