This document is page 19 of 83 from a court filing (Document 565) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 19, 2021. It contains Instruction No. 12 regarding 'Conspiracy and Substantive Counts,' explaining the legal distinction between agreeing to commit a crime (conspiracy) and actually committing the crime (substantive). The text outlines that the jury will be instructed on substantive Counts Two, Four, and Six before conspiracy Counts One, Three, and Five.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Presiding Judge | Judge |
The speaker ('I') issuing the instructions to the jury regarding legal definitions.
|
| Defendant | Defendant |
Generic reference in legal instruction regarding guilt for conspiracy and substantive crimes.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Congress |
Mentioned as the body that deemed it appropriate to make conspiracy a separate crime.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Inferred from the Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR-00008725'.
|
"A conspiracy to commit a crime is an entirely separate and different offense from the substantive crime which may be the object of the conspiracy."Source
"The essence of the crime of conspiracy is an agreement or understanding to violate other laws."Source
"Thus, if a conspiracy exists, even if it fails, it is still punishable as a crime."Source
"Therefore I will instruct you first on Counts Two, Four, and Six, and then I will instruct you on Counts One, Three, and Five."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,921 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document