DOJ-OGR-00011627.jpg
601 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
601 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Comey addresses the Court regarding an issue where the defense has subpoenaed the attorney representing 'Minor Victim 4' to testify at trial. The government argues they cannot understand what admissible testimony this attorney could offer that isn't covered by attorney-client privilege and indicates they will move to preclude it.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Comey | Prosecutor (Government) |
Speaking to the court regarding defense subpoenas and cross-examination grounds.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing; likely Judge Paul A. Engelmayer based on case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Thanking the court.
|
| Minor Victim 4 | Victim/Witness |
Referenced as being represented by an attorney who was subpoenaed by the defense.
|
| Attorney for Minor Victim 4 | Attorney |
Unnamed individual served with a subpoena by the defense to testify at trial.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Implied by footer stamp DOJ-OGR-00011627.
|
|
| The Defense |
Legal team representing the defendant (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell based on case number).
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution team.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Filed 08/10/22
Pre-trial court hearing/conference regarding subpoenas and cross-examination scope.
Courtroom (Southern District)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY), inferred from reporter name and case context.
|
Relationships (3)
Argues on behalf of the government/prosecution.
Speaks on behalf of the defense.
Described as 'the attorney who currently represents Minor Victim 4'.
Key Quotes (4)
"we by no means mean to bind the defense against raising an issue that comes up during direct."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011627.jpg
Quote #1
"the defense has served the attorney who currently represents Minor Victim 4 with a subpoena, seeking his testimony at this trial."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011627.jpg
Quote #2
"We've attempted to confer on this issue because the government has no idea what admissible testimony that attorney could possibly offer at this trial that would not be covered by attorney-client privilege."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011627.jpg
Quote #3
"We would move to preclude it, but we cannot fathom what the testimony would be."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011627.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,506 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 739 Filed 08/10/22 Page 6 of 43 6
LBNAMAXTps
LBNAMAXTps
1 in my life, I think you can come to point of agreement, can't
2 you?
3 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. Indeed we told the
4 defense that we by no means mean to bind the defense against
5 raising an issue that comes up during direct. We just wanted
6 to know ex ante as things stand, do they have a good-faith
7 basis to believe that there's a grounds for cross-examination
8 along those topics.
9 THE COURT: It sounds like, I bet, this conversation
10 could happen without me and everybody else in this room. But
11 I'm glad to be here for you.
12 MS. COMEY: Thank you, your Honor.
13 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you, your Honor. Thank you.
14 THE COURT: What's next?
15 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, the other issue was, we've
16 become aware recently of a number of subpoenas that the defense
17 has served on witnesses. There's one in particular that we
18 wanted raise at this juncture, which is, the defense has served
19 the attorney who currently represents Minor Victim 4 with a
20 subpoena, seeking his testimony at this trial. We've attempted
21 to confer on this issue because the government has no idea what
22 admissible testimony that attorney could possibly offer at this
23 trial that would not be covered by attorney-client privilege.
24 We would move to preclude it, but we cannot fathom what the
25 testimony would be. And so we're raising it with your Honor
2 you?
3 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. Indeed we told the
4 defense that we by no means mean to bind the defense against
5 raising an issue that comes up during direct. We just wanted
6 to know ex ante as things stand, do they have a good-faith
7 basis to believe that there's a grounds for cross-examination
8 along those topics.
9 THE COURT: It sounds like, I bet, this conversation
10 could happen without me and everybody else in this room. But
11 I'm glad to be here for you.
12 MS. COMEY: Thank you, your Honor.
13 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you, your Honor. Thank you.
14 THE COURT: What's next?
15 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, the other issue was, we've
16 become aware recently of a number of subpoenas that the defense
17 has served on witnesses. There's one in particular that we
18 wanted raise at this juncture, which is, the defense has served
19 the attorney who currently represents Minor Victim 4 with a
20 subpoena, seeking his testimony at this trial. We've attempted
21 to confer on this issue because the government has no idea what
22 admissible testimony that attorney could possibly offer at this
23 trial that would not be covered by attorney-client privilege.
24 We would move to preclude it, but we cannot fathom what the
25 testimony would be. And so we're raising it with your Honor
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011627
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document