DOJ-OGR-00001060.jpg
629 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
629 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770, dated April 1, 2021) where a defense attorney argues against the government's claim that the defendant is a flight risk for changing her contact information. The attorney explains that the defendant changed her email and phone number because she was hacked and received 'strange e-mails' after the Second Circuit unsealed civil case documents—revealing her personal data—around the time of Jeffrey Epstein's arrest in August 2019. The attorney asserts she kept the hacked phone to preserve evidence for ongoing civil litigation.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant ('She') | Defendant/Appellee |
Subject of a flight risk argument; her phone was hacked and email released in 2019. (Context suggests Ghislaine Maxwe...
|
| Mr. Epstein | Deceased/Accused |
Mentioned to establish the timeline of August 2019 regarding his arrest.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
The judge presiding over the current hearing.
|
| Counsel | Attorneys |
Lawyers representing the defendant in civil litigation.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Second Circuit |
Court of Appeals that ruled on unsealing civil case records.
|
|
| The Government |
The prosecution/Department of Justice.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Transcription service provider.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on the reporter's name (likely SDNY).
|
Relationships (2)
Civil litigation involving the defendant was unsealed around the time of Epstein's arrest.
Mention of correspondence with her counsel in civil litigation.
Key Quotes (3)
"She is a risk of flight because she changed her e-mail and phone number."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001060.jpg
Quote #1
"Her phone is hacked, and she had to change e-mails and change the account."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001060.jpg
Quote #2
"Her obligation is to keep evidence, not destroy it, and is advised that a way to keep it"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001060.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,613 characters)
Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page119 of 200 56
k7e2MaxC kjc
k7e2MaxC kjc
1 hiding. She is a risk of flight because she changed her e-mail
2 and phone number. That's what we heard in the opening brief.
3 Well, what happened? Something the government, frankly, should
4 know about, because it was certainly public, last year, in a
5 civil litigation, in August of 2019, right around the time of
6 the arrest of Mr. Epstein, the Second Circuit ruled that
7 certain records in one of the civil cases should be unsealed
8 and released to the public. That was done. There was no stay
9 at the moment. The demand was issued, and the documents were
10 released. Certain of those documents were supposed to be
11 redacted and sometimes they were and sometimes they were not,
12 documents including e-mail addresses, Social Security numbers,
13 names, phone numbers, the sorts of things your Honor, I am
14 sure, has to deal with all the time in these kinds of
15 situations.
16 But as it turned out, for whatever reason, some of the
17 documents were not redacted and her e-mail address was
18 revealed. Shortly after that, she starts getting strange
19 e-mails. Her phone is hacked, and she had to change e-mails
20 and change the account.
21 Now she has got a phone that has legal materials on
22 it, correspondence with her counsel in civil litigation that's
23 been hacked, so she keeps it. Why does she keep it? Because
24 she is in civil litigation. Her obligation is to keep
25 evidence, not destroy it, and is advised that a way to keep it
2 and phone number. That's what we heard in the opening brief.
3 Well, what happened? Something the government, frankly, should
4 know about, because it was certainly public, last year, in a
5 civil litigation, in August of 2019, right around the time of
6 the arrest of Mr. Epstein, the Second Circuit ruled that
7 certain records in one of the civil cases should be unsealed
8 and released to the public. That was done. There was no stay
9 at the moment. The demand was issued, and the documents were
10 released. Certain of those documents were supposed to be
11 redacted and sometimes they were and sometimes they were not,
12 documents including e-mail addresses, Social Security numbers,
13 names, phone numbers, the sorts of things your Honor, I am
14 sure, has to deal with all the time in these kinds of
15 situations.
16 But as it turned out, for whatever reason, some of the
17 documents were not redacted and her e-mail address was
18 revealed. Shortly after that, she starts getting strange
19 e-mails. Her phone is hacked, and she had to change e-mails
20 and change the account.
21 Now she has got a phone that has legal materials on
22 it, correspondence with her counsel in civil litigation that's
23 been hacked, so she keeps it. Why does she keep it? Because
24 she is in civil litigation. Her obligation is to keep
25 evidence, not destroy it, and is advised that a way to keep it
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001060
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001060
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document