DOJ-OGR-00019298.jpg
407 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court document (appellate brief or motion)
File Size:
407 KB
Summary
This is a page from a legal filing dated September 10, 2020, related to Case 20-3061 (likely an appellate case involving Ghislaine Maxwell). The visible text discusses a dispute over a protective order where the government and Judge Nathan refused to allow Ms. Maxwell to share material facts with Judge Preska under seal. The document is heavily redacted.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Sought permission to share information with judicial officers under seal.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Presiding over the criminal case; refused to agree to a modification of the protective order.
|
| Judge Preska | Judge |
The specific judicial officer Ms. Maxwell wished to inform of material facts.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The government |
Refused to modify protective order.
|
|
| DOJ-OGR |
Source of the document (stamped in footer).
|
Timeline (1 events)
Prior to 2020-09-10
Refusal of Protective Order Modification
Court (Criminal Case)
Relationships (2)
Judge Nathan presides over the criminal case involving Maxwell.
Maxwell sought to inform Preska of material facts.
Key Quotes (2)
"The government in the criminal case before Judge Nathan refused to agree to a modification of the protective order to allow Ms. Maxwell to inform Judge Preska of the material facts."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019298.jpg
Quote #1
"According to the government, even though all Ms. Maxwell sought was permission to share the requested information with other judicial officers under seal, a"Source
DOJ-OGR-00019298.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (605 characters)
Case 20-3061, Document 17, 09/10/2020, 2928288, Page12 of 15
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
. The government in the criminal case before Judge Nathan refused to agree to a modification of the protective order to allow Ms. Maxwell to inform Judge Preska of the material facts. EXHIBIT G.
According to the government, even though all Ms. Maxwell sought was permission to share the requested information with other judicial officers under seal, a
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
[REDACTED BLOCK]
. The government in the criminal case before Judge Nathan refused to agree to a modification of the protective order to allow Ms. Maxwell to inform Judge Preska of the material facts. EXHIBIT G.
According to the government, even though all Ms. Maxwell sought was permission to share the requested information with other judicial officers under seal, a
11
DOJ-OGR-00019298
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document