DOJ-OGR-00013293.jpg

548 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 548 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge, Ms. Sternheim (Defense), and Mr. Rohrbach (Government) regarding the admissibility of evidence (exhibits 823 and 824, identified as insurance cards). The Judge cites *United States v. Lieberman* as relevant case law while the court waits for a delayed juror.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ms. Sternheim Defense Attorney
Discussing evidence handling and legal arguments.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the hearing, citing legal precedent, managing jury issues.
Mr. Rohrbach Prosecutor (Government)
Responding to the judge regarding case law and evidence.
Juror Juror
Delayed due to a train issue.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
Court proceedings regarding evidence admission and legal citations.
Courtroom
2022-08-10
Recess
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the court (implied SDNY based on case number format and reporters)

Relationships (2)

Ms. Sternheim Adversarial Legal Counsel Mr. Rohrbach
Opposing counsel in court proceedings.
The Court Judicial Mr. Rohrbach
Judge questioning prosecutor on case law familiarity.

Key Quotes (3)

"We have one juror who had a substantial train issue and had to back up and revert"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013293.jpg
Quote #1
"It's pretty much directly on point, I think, for Ms. Sternheim's argument regarding the content of 823 and 824."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013293.jpg
Quote #2
"Do you have any reason to think that the witness would testify that the employer does anything to verify the information filled out by the employee on the insurance cards?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013293.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,335 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 15 of 262 1720
LC8Cmax1
1 MS. STERNHEIM: I believe the government is putting
2 those in evidence; is that correct? Are you going to be moving
3 those into evidence?
4 THE COURT: 823 and 824.
5 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, I am.
6 MS. STERNHEIM: You can hold onto them if you would
7 like. I imagine they'll be putting them on the screen.
8 THE COURT: I'll keep them for now then. Thank you.
9 (Recess)
10 THE COURT: We have one juror who had a substantial
11 train issue and had to back up and revert, who called worried
12 that they were late and we said just get here safely. So we're
13 not quite ready with all the jurors yet.
14 Mr. Rohrbach, you know that case, United States v.
15 Lieberman?
16 MR. ROHRBACH: I am not familiar with that case, your
17 Honor.
18 THE COURT: It's pretty much directly on point, I
19 think, for Ms. Sternheim's argument regarding the content of
20 823 and 824. Let me give you the cite. It is United States v.
21 Lieberman, 637 F.2d 95 (2d Cir. 1980).
22 Do you have any reason to think that the witness would
23 testify that the employer does anything to verify the
24 information filled out by the employee on the insurance cards?
25 MR. ROHRBACH: First of all, for 823, your Honor,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013293

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document