This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge, Ms. Sternheim (Defense), and Mr. Rohrbach (Government) regarding the admissibility of evidence (exhibits 823 and 824, identified as insurance cards). The Judge cites *United States v. Lieberman* as relevant case law while the court waits for a delayed juror.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Discussing evidence handling and legal arguments.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, citing legal precedent, managing jury issues.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Prosecutor (Government) |
Responding to the judge regarding case law and evidence.
|
| Juror | Juror |
Delayed due to a train issue.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government | ||
| United States | ||
| 2d Cir. |
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court (implied SDNY based on case number format and reporters)
|
"We have one juror who had a substantial train issue and had to back up and revert"Source
"It's pretty much directly on point, I think, for Ms. Sternheim's argument regarding the content of 823 and 824."Source
"Do you have any reason to think that the witness would testify that the employer does anything to verify the information filled out by the employee on the insurance cards?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,335 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document