DOJ-OGR-00001451.jpg
646 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal court filing / government brief
File Size:
646 KB
Summary
This page from a 2021 legal filing discusses Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC. It details her complaints regarding sleep disruption due to flashlight checks and the lack of an eye mask, noting that the MDC does not issue eye masks but allows other items to be used. The document records that Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's request to modify the monitoring schedule on May 14, 2021, stating her claims were unsupported by an affidavit.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant / Inmate |
Subject of the confinement conditions discussion; disputed MDC security schedules.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Issued a written decision on May 14, 2021, denying Maxwell's request regarding nighttime monitoring.
|
| MDC Staff | Prison Personnel |
Accused by Maxwell of shining flashlights in her eyes; noted by Government to permit Maxwell to cover eyes with avail...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MDC |
Metropolitan Detention Center; facility where Maxwell is confined.
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution/DOJ; noted MDC policies regarding eye masks.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00001451).
|
Timeline (2 events)
2021-05-07
Maxwell filed a reply letter disputing MDC's explanation for enhanced security schedules.
MDC
2021-05-14
Judge Nathan issued a decision denying Maxwell's request to modify nighttime monitoring.
Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Detention center where Maxwell is held.
|
Relationships (2)
Judge Nathan issued a decision denying Maxwell's request.
Dispute over flashlight checks and eye masks.
Key Quotes (3)
"Maxwell’s claim that MDC staff was shining a flashlight directly into her eyes and disrupting her sleep was “unsupported by affidavit or other factual showing.”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001451.jpg
Quote #1
"“there are a number of neutral reasons”"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001451.jpg
Quote #2
"MDC staff do, however, permit Maxwell to cover her eyes at night using other items that are available in commissary or that are issued to inmates."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001451.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,528 characters)
Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page11 of 24
increased stress of a high-profile case, and her sleeping situation in a cell by herself
without a cellmate. (Id. at 2). Third, the Government noted that the MDC would
not permit Maxwell to have an eye mask because such an item is not available in
commissary and is not issued to inmates. (Id.). MDC staff do, however, permit
Maxwell to cover her eyes at night using other items that are available in commissary
or that are issued to inmates. (Id.).
without a cellmate. (Id. at 2). Third, the Government noted that the MDC would
not permit Maxwell to have an eye mask because such an item is not available in
commissary and is not issued to inmates. (Id.). MDC staff do, however, permit
Maxwell to cover her eyes at night using other items that are available in commissary
or that are issued to inmates. (Id.).
20. In response, on May 7, 2021, Maxwell filed a reply letter
disputing the MDC’s explanation for the implementation of an enhanced security
schedule for Maxwell and raising additional concerns regarding conditions at the
MDC beyond Maxwell’s sleeping conditions but without seeking particular relief as
to those conditions. (Mot. Ex. E). At no point did Maxwell file an affidavit in
support of her claims regarding the conditions of her confinement.
disputing the MDC’s explanation for the implementation of an enhanced security
schedule for Maxwell and raising additional concerns regarding conditions at the
MDC beyond Maxwell’s sleeping conditions but without seeking particular relief as
to those conditions. (Mot. Ex. E). At no point did Maxwell file an affidavit in
support of her claims regarding the conditions of her confinement.
21. On May 14, 2021, Judge Nathan issued a written decision
denying Maxwell’s request for an order directing the MDC to modify its nighttime
monitoring schedule. (Mot. Ex. B). In reaching this decision, Judge Nathan
noted that Maxwell’s claim that MDC staff was shining a flashlight directly into her
eyes and disrupting her sleep was “unsupported by affidavit or other factual
showing.” (Id. at 1). Judge Nathan emphasized that all MDC inmates are subject
to nighttime flashlight checks and found that “there are a number of neutral reasons”
denying Maxwell’s request for an order directing the MDC to modify its nighttime
monitoring schedule. (Mot. Ex. B). In reaching this decision, Judge Nathan
noted that Maxwell’s claim that MDC staff was shining a flashlight directly into her
eyes and disrupting her sleep was “unsupported by affidavit or other factual
showing.” (Id. at 1). Judge Nathan emphasized that all MDC inmates are subject
to nighttime flashlight checks and found that “there are a number of neutral reasons”
11
DOJ-OGR-00001451
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document