This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Exhibit 120-2) authored by attorney William Julié. It outlines legal arguments regarding extradition requests between the United States and France, specifically focusing on the 'nationality protection' clause in the 1996 Extradition Treaty and the French Code of Criminal Procedure. The text argues that extradition should not be granted if the person sought holds French nationality at the time of the offense.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| William Julié | Attorney at Law / Avocat à la Cour |
Author of the legal document arguing regarding extradition laws.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| William Julié Avocats |
Law firm located in Paris
|
|
| Ministry |
Likely the French Ministry of Justice, whose interpretation of the law is being challenged.
|
|
| United States of America |
Party to the extradition treaty.
|
|
| France |
Party to the extradition treaty.
|
|
| European Union |
mentioned in footnote regarding international treaties.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
|
Address of William Julié's law firm.
|
|
|
Location where the US-EU Extradition Agreement was signed.
|
|
|
Location where the Instrument Amending the Treaty was signed.
|
"First, the Ministry’s interpretation goes against the letter of the law."Source
"There is no obligation upon the Requested State to grant the extradition of a person who is a national of the Requested State"Source
"Extradition shall not be granted: 1° When the person claimed has French nationality, the latter being assessed at the time of the offense for which extradition is requested"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,022 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document