DOJ-OGR-00019031.jpg
502 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size:
502 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, likely a pilot for Jeffrey Epstein. Rodgers testifies that during thousands of flights piloted for Epstein between 1994 and 2004 (and after), he never observed females on the plane who appeared to be under the age of 18 or 19 without guardians. He specifically confirms that a woman referred to as 'Jane' appeared to be at least 18 years old when he met her.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rodgers | Witness/Pilot |
Being cross-examined regarding flights piloted for Epstein.
|
| Epstein | Employer/Defendant |
Employer of the pilot; subject of the flight inquiries.
|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney/Prosecutor |
Raises an objection during questioning.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Rules on the objection (Overruled).
|
| Jane | Subject/Passenger |
Pseudonym for a female passenger discussed in direct exam; witness claims she appeared to be at least 18.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information.
|
Key Quotes (2)
"So fair to say in the thousand-plus flights that you flew for Epstein from '94 to 2004, you never once saw any female on the plane who looked under the age of 18 or 19, right? A. No."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019031.jpg
Quote #1
"I think your recollection, isn't it, was that she [Jane] appeared to you to be at least 18 years old when you met her? A. It did."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019031.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,213 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 169 of 262 1880
LC8VMAX6 Rodgers - cross
LC8VMAX6 Rodgers - cross
1 traveling with their parents or a nanny, you didn't see any
2 females on the plane under the age of, say, 18 or 19?
3 A. No.
4 Q. So fair to say in the thousand-plus flights that you flew
5 for Epstein from '94 to 2004, you never once saw any female on
6 the plane who looked under the age of 18 or 19, right?
7 A. No.
8 Q. And, in fact, in the many flights you piloted after 2004,
9 you never once saw any female on the planes who looked under
10 the age of 18 or 19, apart from the ones traveling with their
11 family?
12 MS. COMEY: Objection, your Honor.
13 THE COURT: Just a moment.
14 Overruled.
15 A. That's correct.
16 Q. Okay. And that includes, doesn't it, the woman that you
17 referred to or that we have been referring to as "Jane" in your
18 direct exam; correct?
19 A. Correct.
20 Q. And you do recall meeting Jane, right?
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. I think your recollection, isn't it, was that she appeared
23 to you to be at least 18 years old when you met her?
24 A. It did.
25 Q. And it also includes the woman we've been talking about,
2 females on the plane under the age of, say, 18 or 19?
3 A. No.
4 Q. So fair to say in the thousand-plus flights that you flew
5 for Epstein from '94 to 2004, you never once saw any female on
6 the plane who looked under the age of 18 or 19, right?
7 A. No.
8 Q. And, in fact, in the many flights you piloted after 2004,
9 you never once saw any female on the planes who looked under
10 the age of 18 or 19, apart from the ones traveling with their
11 family?
12 MS. COMEY: Objection, your Honor.
13 THE COURT: Just a moment.
14 Overruled.
15 A. That's correct.
16 Q. Okay. And that includes, doesn't it, the woman that you
17 referred to or that we have been referring to as "Jane" in your
18 direct exam; correct?
19 A. Correct.
20 Q. And you do recall meeting Jane, right?
21 A. Yes.
22 Q. I think your recollection, isn't it, was that she appeared
23 to you to be at least 18 years old when you met her?
24 A. It did.
25 Q. And it also includes the woman we've been talking about,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00019031
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document