This document is a single page (page 9 of 10) from a court transcript filed on February 24, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It records the voir dire examination of a prospective juror who confirms they do not listen to podcasts or follow criminal cases in the news. The juror affirms their ability to be fair and impartial to both sides, and both Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Sternheim decline to ask further questions.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge/Presiding Officer |
Conducting voir dire (questioning) of a prospective juror regarding impartiality and background.
|
| JUROR | Prospective Juror |
Answering questions about hobbies, media consumption, and ability to remain impartial.
|
| MS. POMERANTZ | Counsel (likely Prosecution) |
Declines to ask further questions of the juror.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Counsel (likely Defense) |
Declines to ask further questions of the juror.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
"THE COURT: Have you ever followed a criminal case either on the news or podcasts or the like? JUROR: I have not."Source
"THE COURT: In these questions, I have tried to, of course, get a sense of whether you can be fair to both sides in this case. Any doubt about your ability to do that? JUROR: No."Source
"THE COURT: Other than what I have asked you, do you have any reason to think that you can't be fair and impartial here? JUROR: I do not."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,147 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document