DOJ-OGR-00009106.jpg

484 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (voir dire/jury selection)
File Size: 484 KB
Summary

This document is a single page (page 9 of 10) from a court transcript filed on February 24, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It records the voir dire examination of a prospective juror who confirms they do not listen to podcasts or follow criminal cases in the news. The juror affirms their ability to be fair and impartial to both sides, and both Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Sternheim decline to ask further questions.

People (4)

Name Role Context
THE COURT Judge/Presiding Officer
Conducting voir dire (questioning) of a prospective juror regarding impartiality and background.
JUROR Prospective Juror
Answering questions about hobbies, media consumption, and ability to remain impartial.
MS. POMERANTZ Counsel (likely Prosecution)
Declines to ask further questions of the juror.
MS. STERNHEIM Counsel (likely Defense)
Declines to ask further questions of the juror.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (1 events)

2022-02-24
Jury selection/Voir dire proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Courtroom (Southern District)

Relationships (2)

THE COURT Judicial JUROR
Judge questioning potential juror during selection process.
MS. POMERANTZ Opposing Counsel MS. STERNHEIM
Both addressed as 'Counsel' by the court and given opportunity to question.

Key Quotes (3)

"THE COURT: Have you ever followed a criminal case either on the news or podcasts or the like? JUROR: I have not."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009106.jpg
Quote #1
"THE COURT: In these questions, I have tried to, of course, get a sense of whether you can be fair to both sides in this case. Any doubt about your ability to do that? JUROR: No."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009106.jpg
Quote #2
"THE COURT: Other than what I have asked you, do you have any reason to think that you can't be fair and impartial here? JUROR: I do not."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009106.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,147 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 9 of 10 134
LBG8MAXVD1
1 THE COURT: Do you listen to the radio?
2 JUROR: I do not. I do listen to music, though.
3 THE COURT: What about podcasts?
4 JUROR: I do not.
5 THE COURT: Hobbies or things you do for fun?
6 JUROR: I love to travel and hang out with friends.
7 THE COURT: Have you ever followed a criminal case
8 either on the news or podcasts or the like?
9 JUROR: I have not.
10 THE COURT: Any clubs or organizations to which you
11 contribute time or money?
12 JUROR: I do not contribute to anything right now.
13 THE COURT: You have in the past?
14 JUROR: In college.
15 THE COURT: In these questions, I have tried to, of
16 course, get a sense of whether you can be fair to both sides in
17 this case. Any doubt about your ability to do that?
18 JUROR: No.
19 THE COURT: Other than what I have asked you, do you
20 have any reason to think that you can't be fair and impartial
21 here?
22 JUROR: I do not.
23 THE COURT: Counsel, any questions?
24 MS. POMERANTZ: No. Thank you.
25 MS. STERNHEIM: No. Thank you.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009106

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document