DOJ-OGR-00017962.jpg
510 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size:
510 KB
Summary
This document is page 89 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio regarding psychological concepts including confabulation, delayed disclosure, secondary gain, and malingering. Ms. Pomerantz repeatedly objects to the questioning, and the Court sustains most objections.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Rocchio | Witness |
Undergoing cross-examination regarding psychological concepts of memory and disclosure.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Raising objections to the defense's line of questioning.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Ruling on objections (Sustained/Overruled).
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (inferred from Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Courtroom (Southern District)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by case number format and 'Southern District Reporters'.
|
Relationships (1)
Pomerantz objects to questions directed at Rocchio.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,203 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 89 of 228 765
LC2Qmax3 Rocchio - Cross
LC2Qmax3 Rocchio - Cross
1 Q. Confabulation is the brain under certain circumstances
2 filling in gaps to make a whole picture of something, correct?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. And a filling in of these gaps may or may not be accurate,
5 but the person actually may believe what's been filled in?
6 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
7 THE COURT: Sustained.
8 Q. When you're talking about delayed disclosure, Dr. Rocchio,
9 you didn't talk about two concepts that can impact delayed
10 closure and memory: One of those would be secondary gain. Are
11 you familiar with that concept?
12 A. I am.
13 Q. That's a diagnostical and statistical manual definition --
14 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
15 THE COURT: Sustained.
16 Q. Are you familiar with the concept of malingering,
17 Dr. Rocchio?
18 A. I am.
19 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
20 THE COURT: Overruled.
21 Q. Malingering is the fabrication of symptoms for financial
22 gain, correct?
23 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection.
24 THE COURT: Sustained.
25 Q. You talked about delays in disclosure about people being
2 filling in gaps to make a whole picture of something, correct?
3 A. Yes.
4 Q. And a filling in of these gaps may or may not be accurate,
5 but the person actually may believe what's been filled in?
6 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
7 THE COURT: Sustained.
8 Q. When you're talking about delayed disclosure, Dr. Rocchio,
9 you didn't talk about two concepts that can impact delayed
10 closure and memory: One of those would be secondary gain. Are
11 you familiar with that concept?
12 A. I am.
13 Q. That's a diagnostical and statistical manual definition --
14 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
15 THE COURT: Sustained.
16 Q. Are you familiar with the concept of malingering,
17 Dr. Rocchio?
18 A. I am.
19 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
20 THE COURT: Overruled.
21 Q. Malingering is the fabrication of symptoms for financial
22 gain, correct?
23 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection.
24 THE COURT: Sustained.
25 Q. You talked about delays in disclosure about people being
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017962
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document