This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between attorneys Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger and the Judge regarding whether to discuss certain topics at a sidebar or to confer with a witness's attorney first. The Judge instructs the counsel to confer with the witness's attorney before bringing the matters to the court.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney (Likely Government/Prosecution) |
Clarifying topics to be discussed with witness's attorney and the court.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney (Defense) |
Discussing sidebar topics and conferring with the government.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, directing counsel to confer before approaching sidebar.
|
| Witness's Attorney | Legal Counsel |
Mentioned as a party that needs to be conferred with regarding potential disagreements.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by Southern District Reporters footer
|
"My preference would be for you to confer first and then let me know."Source
"I think there was one remaining topic that defense counsel preferred to raise as it arises during the course of cross-examination."Source
"I conferred with the government. We have prepared,"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,248 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document