DOJ-OGR-00017626.jpg

522 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 522 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between attorneys Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger and the Judge regarding whether to discuss certain topics at a sidebar or to confer with a witness's attorney first. The Judge instructs the counsel to confer with the witness's attorney before bringing the matters to the court.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ms. Moe Attorney (Likely Government/Prosecution)
Clarifying topics to be discussed with witness's attorney and the court.
Ms. Menninger Attorney (Defense)
Discussing sidebar topics and conferring with the government.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the proceedings, directing counsel to confer before approaching sidebar.
Witness's Attorney Legal Counsel
Mentioned as a party that needs to be conferred with regarding potential disagreements.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
DOJ
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court proceeding regarding sidebar discussions and conferring with witness counsel.
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by Southern District Reporters footer

Relationships (1)

Ms. Menninger Opposing Counsel The Government
Ms. Menninger states 'I conferred with the government.'

Key Quotes (3)

"My preference would be for you to confer first and then let me know."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017626.jpg
Quote #1
"I think there was one remaining topic that defense counsel preferred to raise as it arises during the course of cross-examination."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017626.jpg
Quote #2
"I conferred with the government. We have prepared,"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017626.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,248 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 17 of 264 423
LC1VMAX1
1 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
2 Just to be clear, I think two of those topics were
3 ones that we wanted to just confer with the witness's attorney
4 about, because there may not be any disagreement; we just
5 wanted to confer with him to ensure we have that right.
6 I think there was one remaining topic that defense
7 counsel preferred to raise as it arises during the course of
8 cross-examination. That's what I meant by at sidebar.
9 Apologies.
10 THE COURT: Okay. So is there anything we can discuss
11 now at the sidebar or no?
12 MS. MENNINGER: There's two of the three we can
13 discuss at sidebar. I'm happy -- if the witness's counsel
14 wants to join us at the sidebar and weigh in on what counsel
15 thinks is identifying or not as we discuss it.
16 THE COURT: My preference would be for you to confer
17 first and then let me know.
18 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor, that's what we would
19 propose.
20 THE COURT: Okay.
21 MS. MOE: Thank you.
22 THE COURT: All right.
23 Anything else we can take up now?
24 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.
25 I conferred with the government. We have prepared,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017626

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document