This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The text details proceedings where the jury is not present, and the Court discusses a note received from the jury requesting office supplies (Post-Its, highlighters), a transcript of testimony by a person named "Matt," and a definition of the legal term "enticement." Ms. Moe argues that the jury should be referred back to the original jury instructions stating that such terms have their "ordinary everyday meanings."
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the trial, reading a jury note, and issuing instructions regarding supplies and transcripts.
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Responding to the judge regarding printing a transcript and arguing the definition of 'enticement'.
|
| Matt | Witness/Subject |
Mentioned in the jury note; the jury requested 'Matt's transcript'.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney (Defense) |
Addresses the court at the end of the page.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by DOJ-OGR footer)
|
"May we please have the following items: Different colored Post-Its; white paperboard; highlighters, different colors; and then Matt's transcript; and then also may we have a definition of "enticement.""Source
"The terms persuaded, induced, enticed, and coerced have their ordinary everyday meanings."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,346 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document