DOJ-OGR-00017306.jpg

555 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 555 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The text details proceedings where the jury is not present, and the Court discusses a note received from the jury requesting office supplies (Post-Its, highlighters), a transcript of testimony by a person named "Matt," and a definition of the legal term "enticement." Ms. Moe argues that the jury should be referred back to the original jury instructions stating that such terms have their "ordinary everyday meanings."

People (4)

Name Role Context
The Court Judge
Presiding over the trial, reading a jury note, and issuing instructions regarding supplies and transcripts.
Ms. Moe Attorney (Prosecution)
Responding to the judge regarding printing a transcript and arguing the definition of 'enticement'.
Matt Witness/Subject
Mentioned in the jury note; the jury requested 'Matt's transcript'.
Mr. Everdell Attorney (Defense)
Addresses the court at the end of the page.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated by DOJ-OGR footer)

Timeline (2 events)

Unknown (during trial)
Trial Resumption
Courtroom (Southern District)
Unknown (during trial)
Discussion of Jury Instructions
Courtroom

Relationships (1)

Ms. Moe Professional The Court
Exchange regarding court procedures and legal arguments.

Key Quotes (2)

"May we please have the following items: Different colored Post-Its; white paperboard; highlighters, different colors; and then Matt's transcript; and then also may we have a definition of "enticement.""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017306.jpg
Quote #1
"The terms persuaded, induced, enticed, and coerced have their ordinary everyday meanings."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017306.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,346 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 2 of 29 3119
LCRVMAXT
1 (Trial resumed; jury not present)
2 THE COURT: I did receive a note.
3 May we please have the following items: Different
4 colored Post-Its; white paperboard; highlighters, different
5 colors; and then Matt's transcript; and then also may we have a
6 definition of "enticement."
7 So we're going to get started on the supplies. We'll
8 get them colored Post-Its, white paperboard. I'm not sure
9 exactly what they mean but we'll try and find a large pad, and
10 we'll also give them a whiteboard and dry erase markers and
11 then highlighters.
12 Ms. Moe, Matt's transcript you'll get printed
13 immediately?
14 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
15 THE COURT: Okay. And then I'll hear from the parties
16 as to how they would like to respond to the request for a
17 definition of "enticement."
18 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to the jury's
19 question regarding enticement, our view is that the Court's
20 instruction, which is on page 21, instruction number 15: "The
21 terms persuaded, induced, enticed, and coerced have their
22 ordinary everyday meanings." That remain true now, and so we
23 would propose referring them to that portion of the Court's
24 instruction.
25 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017306

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document