DOJ-OGR-00011553.jpg
614 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
614 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 22, 2022, concerning Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text features arguments between the defense (Mr. Everdell) and the prosecution regarding sentencing enhancements, specifically debating whether Maxwell exercised 'supervisory authority' over an employee named Kellen who scheduled massage appointments. The defense argues that Maxwell's presence in the house while Kellen worked does not constitute supervision, while the prosecution relies on pilot testimony to establish a chain of command.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Discussed regarding her supervisory authority over Kellen and payment of employees.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Deceased/Associate |
Mentioned regarding payment of employees.
|
| Kellen | Employee/Co-conspirator |
Subject of debate regarding whether she was supervised by Maxwell; mentioned as making calls and scheduling massage a...
|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Arguing against the sentencing enhancement regarding supervisory roles.
|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor (Government) |
Responding to the Judge regarding enhancements.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing.
|
| Pilots | Witnesses |
Their testimony regarding the hierarchy between Maxwell and Kellen is referenced.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by DOJ-OGR-00011553 in footer).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-07-22
Court Hearing/Sentencing Proceeding
Southern District of New York (implied by Southern District Reporters)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where Kellen was observed making calls while Maxwell was present.
|
Relationships (2)
Prosecution argues Maxwell had supervisory authority; Defense argues mere presence does not equal supervision.
Mentioned in context of being paid by Maxwell or Epstein.
Key Quotes (4)
"The fact that pilots based on their observation thought at one point that Kellen reported to Maxwell proves the point that she had supervisory authority over Kellen"Source
DOJ-OGR-00011553.jpg
Quote #1
"Being present does not mean that you're a supervisor."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011553.jpg
Quote #2
"Kellen was making the calls and scheduling the massage appointments"Source
DOJ-OGR-00011553.jpg
Quote #3
"five-point enhancement for repeated and dangerous sex offenders"Source
DOJ-OGR-00011553.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,550 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 34 of 101 34
M6SQmax1
M6SQmax1
1 With respect to the testimony of the pilots who
2 testified, whether they -- whether an employee was paid by
3 Maxwell or Epstein or technically reported to one, according to
4 their job descriptions, is not the question here. The fact
5 that pilots based on their observation thought at one point
6 that Kellen reported to Maxwell proves the point that she had
7 supervisory authority over Kellen and exercised it, whether in
8 the chain of command or on their formal employment paperwork,
9 she was just an employee for one or the other, it makes no
10 difference. There was an overlap here. They had different
11 roles in the conspiracy, and the defendant had a supervisory
12 roll over Kellen.
13 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, just to that point. Being
14 present does not mean that you're a supervisor. That's way too
15 far a stretch. So the fact that there was testimony she was
16 present still in the house while Kellen was making the calls
17 and scheduling the massage appointments means nothing in terms
18 of supervisory authority.
19 THE COURT: Thank you. Other enhancements before the
20 government's objection is to be addressed.
21 MS. MOE: No, your Honor. Thank you.
22 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I assume you don't want to
23 hear or have any questions about the five-point enhancement for
24 repeated and dangerous sex offenders.
25 THE COURT: I believe I have what I need, but as I
2 testified, whether they -- whether an employee was paid by
3 Maxwell or Epstein or technically reported to one, according to
4 their job descriptions, is not the question here. The fact
5 that pilots based on their observation thought at one point
6 that Kellen reported to Maxwell proves the point that she had
7 supervisory authority over Kellen and exercised it, whether in
8 the chain of command or on their formal employment paperwork,
9 she was just an employee for one or the other, it makes no
10 difference. There was an overlap here. They had different
11 roles in the conspiracy, and the defendant had a supervisory
12 roll over Kellen.
13 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, just to that point. Being
14 present does not mean that you're a supervisor. That's way too
15 far a stretch. So the fact that there was testimony she was
16 present still in the house while Kellen was making the calls
17 and scheduling the massage appointments means nothing in terms
18 of supervisory authority.
19 THE COURT: Thank you. Other enhancements before the
20 government's objection is to be addressed.
21 MS. MOE: No, your Honor. Thank you.
22 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I assume you don't want to
23 hear or have any questions about the five-point enhancement for
24 repeated and dangerous sex offenders.
25 THE COURT: I believe I have what I need, but as I
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C..
.
.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011553
.
.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011553
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document