DOJ-OGR-00016606.jpg
610 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript / testimony
File Size:
610 KB
Summary
This document is page 123 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It features the direct examination of an expert witness named Loftus (likely memory expert Elizabeth Loftus). The testimony focuses on the stages of memory, specifically describing the 'retention stage' and various 'acts of retrieval' such as discussing an event with others, police questioning, and identifications.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Loftus | Witness / Expert |
Testifying on direct examination regarding memory processes (acquisition, retention, retrieval). Likely Dr. Elizabeth...
|
| Unknown Attorney (Q) | Attorney |
Conducting direct examination of the witness.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR-00016606
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by case number and reporter firm.
|
Relationships (1)
Loftus is testifying in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) on direct examination, presumably for the defense.
Key Quotes (3)
"So there can be a long retention interval peppered with different acts of retrieval."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016606.jpg
Quote #1
"So after some event, say, you know, a robbery, sometimes people might have a conversation with each other about what they saw..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016606.jpg
Quote #2
"That would be a standard situation in a legally relevant event."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016606.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,545 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 123 of 246 2418
LCGCmax4 Loftus - direct
LCGCmax4 Loftus - direct
1 sometimes they're witnesses, and they're not the victim
2 themselves, but --
3 Q. Now, after the acquisition stage, is anything that happens
4 after the event, whichever constitutes the event occurs,
5 considered retention stage?
6 A. Typically, yes. It's after the event is over, so we say,
7 well, that's the retention stage. I don't mean to complicate
8 things too much, but I think you can appreciate that actually
9 there can be many acts of retrieval. So there can be a long
10 retention interval peppered with different acts of retrieval.
11 But I used a simple diagram here to illustrate the three major
12 stages.
13 Q. Can you simply identify what separate acts of retrieval
14 would be.
15 A. So after some event, say, you know, a robbery, sometimes
16 people might have a conversation with each other about what
17 they saw and then sometimes the police might come to the scene
18 and start asking questions about what did you see or what did
19 you hear, and then the person might go to a police station and
20 maybe try to make an identification of somebody who might have
21 been seen at the event, and then somebody may be interviewed
22 many more times, may then testify at trial. That would be a
23 standard situation in a legally relevant event.
24 Q. Now, in each of those retrieval examples you just gave,
25 that is coming from an external source; correct?
2 themselves, but --
3 Q. Now, after the acquisition stage, is anything that happens
4 after the event, whichever constitutes the event occurs,
5 considered retention stage?
6 A. Typically, yes. It's after the event is over, so we say,
7 well, that's the retention stage. I don't mean to complicate
8 things too much, but I think you can appreciate that actually
9 there can be many acts of retrieval. So there can be a long
10 retention interval peppered with different acts of retrieval.
11 But I used a simple diagram here to illustrate the three major
12 stages.
13 Q. Can you simply identify what separate acts of retrieval
14 would be.
15 A. So after some event, say, you know, a robbery, sometimes
16 people might have a conversation with each other about what
17 they saw and then sometimes the police might come to the scene
18 and start asking questions about what did you see or what did
19 you hear, and then the person might go to a police station and
20 maybe try to make an identification of somebody who might have
21 been seen at the event, and then somebody may be interviewed
22 many more times, may then testify at trial. That would be a
23 standard situation in a legally relevant event.
24 Q. Now, in each of those retrieval examples you just gave,
25 that is coming from an external source; correct?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016606
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016606
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document