DOJ-OGR-00005375.jpg
625 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order
File Size:
625 KB
Summary
This is a court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 25, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan sets deadlines for omnibus response briefs (due Oct 25) and reply briefs (due Oct 27) regarding motions in limine. The order also mandates that by October 29, 2021, the parties must file public versions of these briefs with proposed redactions and submit a joint letter justifying those redactions based on Second Circuit legal standards.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the criminal case and the motions in limine.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | District Judge |
Judge issuing the order regarding filing deadlines and redactions.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Venue where the case is being heard.
|
|
| United States of America |
The Government entity prosecuting the case.
|
|
| Second Circuit |
Cited as legal authority for redaction standards (Lugosch v. Pyramid Co.).
|
|
| Pyramid Co. of Onondaga |
Mentioned in the case citation regarding redaction tests.
|
Timeline (4 events)
2021-10-29
Deadline to file public docket briefing with proposed redactions and joint justification letter.
USDC SDNY
Government
Defense
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the court.
|
Relationships (1)
Judge Nathan issuing an order in the case United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
Key Quotes (3)
"The parties are further ORDERED that reply briefs, if any, are due by October 27, 2021."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005375.jpg
Quote #1
"Each sides’ responses and any replies must be filed as a single document."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005375.jpg
Quote #2
"The parties are ORDERED to file on the public docket all briefing with both parties’ proposed redactions, and a joint letter justifying any requested redactions..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00005375.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,681 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 368 Filed 10/25/21 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 10/25/21
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 10/25/21
United States of America,
-v-
Ghislaine Maxwell,
Defendant.
20-CR-330 (AJN)
ORDER
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:
On October 18, 2021, the parties filed their respective motions in limine. Dkt. Nos. 355,
357, 358. Responses are due today, October 25, 2021. The parties are further ORDERED that
reply briefs, if any, are due by October 27, 2021. Each sides’ responses and any replies must be
filed as a single document. For example, the Government should file an omnibus response brief
to all of the motions in limine filed by the Defendant, and the Defendant should file an omnibus
response brief to the Government’s omnibus motion in limine. Similarly, any reply by the
Defendant should be an omnibus reply document and same for the Government.
357, 358. Responses are due today, October 25, 2021. The parties are further ORDERED that
reply briefs, if any, are due by October 27, 2021. Each sides’ responses and any replies must be
filed as a single document. For example, the Government should file an omnibus response brief
to all of the motions in limine filed by the Defendant, and the Defendant should file an omnibus
response brief to the Government’s omnibus motion in limine. Similarly, any reply by the
Defendant should be an omnibus reply document and same for the Government.
The parties filed their motions in limine temporarily under seal to allow for the other
side’s proposal and the Court’s consideration of redactions. See Dkt. Nos. 358-59. Each side
should consider the other party’s briefs—including any responses filed on October 25, and any
replies filed on October 27—and indicate whether they seek any additional redaction requests.
The parties are ORDERED to file on the public docket all briefing with both parties’ proposed
redactions, and a joint letter justifying any requested redactions by reference to the three-part test
articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir.
2006), on or before October 29, 2021.
side’s proposal and the Court’s consideration of redactions. See Dkt. Nos. 358-59. Each side
should consider the other party’s briefs—including any responses filed on October 25, and any
replies filed on October 27—and indicate whether they seek any additional redaction requests.
The parties are ORDERED to file on the public docket all briefing with both parties’ proposed
redactions, and a joint letter justifying any requested redactions by reference to the three-part test
articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir.
2006), on or before October 29, 2021.
SO ORDERED.
1
DOJ-OGR-00005375
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document