DOJ-OGR-00009400.jpg
421 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript / deposition
File Size:
421 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Edelstein. The questioning focuses on whether Edelstein performed Google research on 'May 12th' regarding a suspended New York attorney named Catherine Conrad, after allegedly being tipped off by Theresa Trzaskoma. The witness denies having Conrad's phone number on that date and clarifies the specific information received from Trzaskoma.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edelstein | Witness |
Person testifying/answering questions about research conducted on May 12th.
|
| Catherine Conrad | Subject of Inquiry |
A suspended New York attorney whom the witness is being questioned about regarding research and phone numbers.
|
| Mr. Schectman | Attorney |
Lawyer objecting to the questioning style, defending the witness.
|
| Theresa Trzaskoma | Source of Information |
Allegedly informed the witness about a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Overrules Mr. Schectman's objection.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting firm listed in the footer.
|
|
|
Mentioned as a tool for potential research.
|
||
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00009400).
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in line 1 regarding a phone number.
|
|
|
Jurisdiction of the suspended attorney Catherine Conrad.
|
Relationships (2)
Testimony discusses information Trzaskoma provided to Edelstein regarding a suspended attorney.
Schectman intervenes to defend Edelstein's answering process.
Key Quotes (5)
"We didn't have Ms. Conrad's phone number on May 12."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009400.jpg
Quote #1
"Mr. Schectman: There's nothing unintelligible about the answer, if you would allow the witness to finish."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009400.jpg
Quote #2
"The Court: Overruled."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009400.jpg
Quote #3
"Didn't Theresa Trzaskoma tell you that she had seen evidence that there was a suspended New York attorney named Catherine Conrad?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009400.jpg
Quote #4
"What I said was she had told me there was a suspended lawyer with the name Catherine Conrad."Source
DOJ-OGR-00009400.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,351 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 616-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 111 of 130
A-5796
A-5796
339
C2GFDAU3
Edelstein
1 Bronxville, but the same phone number.
2 Q. You would agree with me, would you not, that that's the
3 very same computer research over the course of a couple of
4 minutes that you could have done on May 12th, right?
5 A. Well, one could have done that on May 12th. We didn't have
6 Ms. Conrad's phone number on May 12.
7 Q. So the answer is yes, you could have done that research on
8 May 12th, right?
9 A. I could have done a Google search --
10 Q. Was there something unintelligible about my question?
11 MR. SCHECTMAN: There's nothing unintelligible about
12 the answer, if you would allow the witness to finish.
13 THE COURT: Overruled.
14 Q. Could you answer? Could you have done that research on
15 May 12?
16 A. No. I can explain.
17 Q. Well, you were informed there was a Catherine Conrad
18 suspension report by Theresa Trzaskoma, correct?
19 A. No.
20 Q. Didn't Theresa Trzaskoma tell you that she had seen
21 evidence that there was a suspended New York attorney named
22 Catherine Conrad? Didn't you just tell that to us a few
23 minutes ago?
24 A. No. What I said was she had told me there was a suspended
25 lawyer with the name Catherine Conrad. She did not mention a
C2GFDAU3
Edelstein
1 Bronxville, but the same phone number.
2 Q. You would agree with me, would you not, that that's the
3 very same computer research over the course of a couple of
4 minutes that you could have done on May 12th, right?
5 A. Well, one could have done that on May 12th. We didn't have
6 Ms. Conrad's phone number on May 12.
7 Q. So the answer is yes, you could have done that research on
8 May 12th, right?
9 A. I could have done a Google search --
10 Q. Was there something unintelligible about my question?
11 MR. SCHECTMAN: There's nothing unintelligible about
12 the answer, if you would allow the witness to finish.
13 THE COURT: Overruled.
14 Q. Could you answer? Could you have done that research on
15 May 12?
16 A. No. I can explain.
17 Q. Well, you were informed there was a Catherine Conrad
18 suspension report by Theresa Trzaskoma, correct?
19 A. No.
20 Q. Didn't Theresa Trzaskoma tell you that she had seen
21 evidence that there was a suspended New York attorney named
22 Catherine Conrad? Didn't you just tell that to us a few
23 minutes ago?
24 A. No. What I said was she had told me there was a suspended
25 lawyer with the name Catherine Conrad. She did not mention a
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009400
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009400
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document