DOJ-OGR-00000472.jpg

699 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order/decision (us district court)
File Size: 699 KB
Summary

This is the first page of a Decision & Order filed on July 18, 2019, in the Southern District of New York regarding the remand of Jeffrey Epstein. The document outlines the background of the bail hearing held on July 15, 2019, reiterates the presumption of innocence, and identifies the federal charges (sex trafficking and conspiracy) and relevant statutes (18 U.S.C. § 1591, § 371, and § 3142).

People (2)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Charged with sex trafficking and conspiracy; subject of bail hearing regarding remand vs. release.
RMB Judge (Presiding)
Initials appearing in the Case Number (19 CR. 490 (RMB)), indicating Judge Richard M. Berman.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
United States District Court Southern District of New York
Venue of the legal proceedings.
United States of America
Prosecuting party.

Timeline (3 events)

2019-07-08
Date of transcript cited in the order.
Court
2019-07-15
Bail hearing held.
USDC SDNY
2019-07-18
Decision & Order Remanding Defendant filed.
USDC SDNY
Jeffrey Epstein US Government

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the court.

Relationships (1)

United States of America Legal Adversary Jeffrey Epstein
Case caption: United States of America, Government, - against - Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant.

Key Quotes (4)

"The issue before the Court is whether the Defendant should continue to be remanded (incarcerated) pending trial or whether he should be granted release while the case proceeds."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000472.jpg
Quote #1
"Jeffrey Epstein, is innocent of the Federal charges alleged against him now and until such time, if it comes, that a jury or the Court finds... that he is guilty."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000472.jpg
Quote #2
"The key federal statute that applies here is 18 U.S.C. § 1591 which sets forth the crime of sex trafficking with which Mr. Epstein is charged."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000472.jpg
Quote #3
"Mr. Epstein is also charged with conspiring with others to commit sex trafficking under 18 U.S.C. § 371."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000472.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,875 characters)

Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 1 of 33
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 7/18/19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
--------------------------------------------------------------x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
:
Government,
:
19 CR. 490 (RMB)
:
- against -
: DECISION & ORDER
: REMANDING DEFENDANT
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
:
Defendant.
:
--------------------------------------------------------------x
A. Background
This ruling follows the Court’s bail hearing held on July 15, 2019. The issue before the
Court is whether the Defendant should continue to be remanded (incarcerated) pending trial or
whether he should be granted release while the case proceeds. No matter the answer to this
question and no matter what has been said in Court in analyzing the matter, this is a criminal
case and the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is innocent of the Federal charges alleged against him
now and until such time, if it comes, that a jury or the Court finds (after fair and thorough
consideration of the facts and the law) that he is guilty. See Transcript, dated July 8, 2019
(“7/8/19 Tr.”), at 2-3; Transcript, dated July 15, 2019 (“7/15/19 Tr.”), at 40. It should also be
borne in mind that the Court has not (yet) been presented with a motion to dismiss the
Indictment.
This is a federal as opposed to a state case. We proceed under federal law and federal
rules. The key federal statute that applies here is 18 U.S.C. § 1591 which sets forth the crime of
sex trafficking with which Mr. Epstein is charged. Mr. Epstein is also charged with conspiring
with others to commit sex trafficking under 18 U.S.C. § 371.
With respect to the issue of remand versus release, 18 U.S.C. § 3142 applies. It sets forth
a presumption in favor of remand, an exception to the presumption in most cases which favors
DOJ-OGR-00000472

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document