This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Menninger (defense) explains the delay in reviewing materials due to the volume of '3500 material,' mentioning approximately 500 nontestifying witnesses. The Court questions why an application to enforce a subpoena for a potential defense witness was filed late at night (11:54) despite the witness being disclosed for months.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney |
Addressing the court regarding discovery materials and subpoenas (Likely Laura Menninger, defense counsel for Ghislai...
|
| The Court | Judge |
Questioning the timing of a subpoena enforcement application (Judge Alison J. Nathan based on case number AJN)
|
| Witness 1 | Testifying Witness |
Mentioned as a testifying witness whose materials were received
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR-00016877
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case number format
|
"there was approximately 500 nontestifying witnesses with similar volumes of interviews"Source
"I'm just trying to understand why I got an application at 11:54... seeking enforcement of a trial subpoena regarding a witness who's been disclosed"Source
"unlikely the other witnesses the defense attempted to serve a subpoena on, you received no contact"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,371 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document