DOJ-OGR-00018864.jpg
577 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
577 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves a procedural dispute between the prosecution (Mr. Rohrbach) and the defense (Ms. Menninger) regarding the potential recalling of a witness named Jane and the subpoena status of a witness named Brian. The defense raises concerns about missing disclosures regarding conversations Jane had with her brother, questioning the truthfulness of the recounting of events.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the procedural discussion.
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Government Attorney (Prosecutor) |
Inquiring about defense plans to recall witnesses Jane and Brian.
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Defense Attorney |
Discussing disclosure issues regarding witness Jane and the subpoena status of witness Brian.
|
| Jane | Witness |
Subject of potential recall by defense; her conversations with her brother are under scrutiny for truthfulness.
|
| Brian | Witness |
Under defense subpoena; government withdrew him as a witness.
|
| Jane's Brother | Family member of witness |
Mentioned as having had conversations with Jane that are subject to disclosure.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in footer.
|
|
| The Government |
Represented by Mr. Rohrbach.
|
|
| The Defense |
Represented by Ms. Menninger.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10 (File Date)
Court hearing regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Discussion concerns witness recall and credibility.
Courtroom (Southern District of New York implied by case number)
The Court
Mr. Rohrbach
Ms. Menninger
Relationships (2)
Ms. Menninger refers to 'conversations she had with her brother'.
Speaker label 'MR. ROHRBACH' speaking for 'the government'.
Key Quotes (3)
"I think we need to know whether there is not truth telling going on in the recounting of this event."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018864.jpg
Quote #1
"whether or not the defense is planning to recall Jane and whether they are releasing Brian from subpoena."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018864.jpg
Quote #2
"I did ask yesterday if you had prevailed on your motion not to exclude Brian, would you subpoena him and you said no."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018864.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,512 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 2 of 262 1707
LC8Cmax1
LC8Cmax1
1 THE COURT: Good morning, everyone. Matters to take
2 up, counsel?
3 MR. ROHRBACH: A couple matters from the government,
4 your Honor.
5 THE COURT: Yes.
6 MR. ROHRBACH: First, we just wanted to confirm, as
7 per our discussion at the end of the day yesterday, that
8 whether or not the defense is planning to recall Jane and
9 whether they are releasing Brian from subpoena.
10 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I had understood that
11 there was going to be a conversation with Jane about the
12 conversations she had with her brother, and that would be
13 disclosed to us. I didn't receive that last night. I think we
14 need to know whether there is not truth telling going on in the
15 recounting of this event.
16 THE COURT: And that's with respect to recalling Jane,
17 not with respect to subpoenaing Brian; correct?
18 MS. MENNINGER: It could be with respect to either
19 one. We already have Brian under subpoena, your Honor. With
20 respect to the calling of Jane, I would like to know that
21 before we make a decision.
22 THE COURT: I did ask yesterday if you had prevailed
23 on your motion not to exclude Brian, would you subpoena him and
24 you said no. I realize you didn't prevail nor did you -- not
25 prevail, the government withdrew him, but is your position now
2 up, counsel?
3 MR. ROHRBACH: A couple matters from the government,
4 your Honor.
5 THE COURT: Yes.
6 MR. ROHRBACH: First, we just wanted to confirm, as
7 per our discussion at the end of the day yesterday, that
8 whether or not the defense is planning to recall Jane and
9 whether they are releasing Brian from subpoena.
10 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I had understood that
11 there was going to be a conversation with Jane about the
12 conversations she had with her brother, and that would be
13 disclosed to us. I didn't receive that last night. I think we
14 need to know whether there is not truth telling going on in the
15 recounting of this event.
16 THE COURT: And that's with respect to recalling Jane,
17 not with respect to subpoenaing Brian; correct?
18 MS. MENNINGER: It could be with respect to either
19 one. We already have Brian under subpoena, your Honor. With
20 respect to the calling of Jane, I would like to know that
21 before we make a decision.
22 THE COURT: I did ask yesterday if you had prevailed
23 on your motion not to exclude Brian, would you subpoena him and
24 you said no. I realize you didn't prevail nor did you -- not
25 prevail, the government withdrew him, but is your position now
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018864
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document