This document appears to be page 184 (Appendix 2) of a House Oversight Committee report (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020643). The content discusses UK-China relations, focusing on Chinese influence operations, human rights violations in Hong Kong, and academic interference at institutions like Cambridge University. While part of a larger production that may contain Epstein materials, this specific page focuses entirely on geopolitical and academic integrity issues involving China and the UK, with no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Godement | Author |
Cited in Note 1 regarding investment figures.
|
| Vasselier | Author |
Cited in Note 1 regarding investment figures.
|
| Benner | Author |
Cited in Note 3.
|
| Paul Hutcheon | Journalist |
Author of article on cyber attacks (Herald Scotland).
|
| Gordon Corera | Journalist |
Author of article on Think Tank hacks (BBC).
|
| George Parker | Journalist |
Author of article on MPs banned from Hong Kong (Financial Times).
|
| Tom Phillips | Journalist |
Author of article on activist barred from Hong Kong (Guardian).
|
| Benjamin Haas | Journalist |
Author of article on activist barred from Hong Kong (Guardian).
|
| Benedict Rogers | Activist |
British Conservative Party Activist mentioned in URL of Note 5 as being barred from Hong Kong.
|
| Lucy Hornby | Journalist |
Author of article on UK-China trade (Financial Times).
|
| James Kynge | Journalist |
Author of article on UK-China trade (Financial Times).
|
| George Packer | Journalist |
Author of article on UK-China trade (Financial Times).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned regarding past influence campaigns and the Woolf Inquiry
|
"A newly launched NGO, Hong Kong Watch, focuses on drawing attention to the United Kingdom’s special responsibility toward Hong Kong."Source
"While the Foreign and Commonwealth Office presents the relationship with China as primarily collaborative, it is also conducting research on Chinese influence and interference activities."Source
"there seems to have been no coherent initiative on protecting academic freedom and maintaining wider ethical standards in the face of these types of campaigns."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (3,119 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document