DOJ-OGR-00019732.jpg

1.37 MB

Extraction Summary

6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court docket / case log
File Size: 1.37 MB
Summary

This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-58) covering entries from December 10 to December 18, 2020, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan approving redactions for a renewed bail application to protect the privacy interests of third parties, notices of transcript filings, and the entry of appearance by attorney Andrew Rohrbach for the government. The document also lists the filing of a Memorandum of Law in support of bail accompanied by numerous exhibits (A through X).

People (6)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the court proceedings, filing renewed bail application.
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Presiding judge signing orders and overseeing proceedings.
Kristen Carannante Court Reporter/Transcriber
Recorded the conference held on 7/14/2020.
Kelly McGuirk Deputy Clerk
Entered transcript notices into the record.
Christian R. Everdell Defense Attorney
Sent letter to Judge Nathan; filed Memorandum of Law in support of bail.
Andrew Rohrbach Attorney
Filed Notice of Attorney Appearance for the USA.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
USA
Plaintiff/Prosecution (United States of America), represented by Andrew Rohrbach.
Second Circuit
Court whose legal precedents (Lugosch, Amodeo) are cited in the Order.
Department of Justice
Indicated by footer DOJ-OGR.

Timeline (3 events)

2020-07-14
Conference held before Judge Alison J. Nathan
Court
2020-12-14
Filing of Memorandum of Law in Support of Renewed Motion for Bail with Exhibits A-X
Court Docket
2020-12-17
Attorney Appearance by Andrew Rohrbach for USA
Court Docket

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied venue based on Judge Nathan and docket format.

Relationships (2)

Ghislaine Maxwell Client-Attorney Christian R. Everdell
Everdell filing letters and memos on behalf of Maxwell.
Andrew Rohrbach Legal Representation USA
Notice of Attorney Appearance Andrew Rohrbach appearing for USA.

Key Quotes (3)

"The Court finds that Defendant's letter motions are 'relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process,' thereby qualifying as a 'judicial document'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019732.jpg
Quote #1
"the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019732.jpg
Quote #2
"The Government did not file any opposition to the Defendant's proposed redactions."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019732.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,767 characters)

Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page17 of 20
necessary steps to ensure that the Defendant continues to receive adequate access to her legal materials and her ability to communicate with defense counsel. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/8/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/08/2020)
12/10/2020 93 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: Conference held on 7/14/2020 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Kristen Carannante, (212) 805–0300, Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/31/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/11/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/10/2021. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020)
12/10/2020 94 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 7/14/2020 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above–captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020)
12/14/2020 95 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 8, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed her renewed application for bail under seal with proposed redactions, in accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89. The Government did not file any opposition to the Defendant's proposed redactions. After due consideration, the Court will adopt the Defendant's proposed redactions. The Court's decision to adopt those redactions is guided by the three–part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are "judicial documents;" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Id. at 11920. "Such countervailing factors include but are not limited to the danger of impairing law enforcement or judicial efficiency' and 'the privacy interests of those resisting disclosure.'" Id. at 120 (quoting United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir.1995) ("Amodeo II")). The proposed redactions satisfy this test. The Court finds that Defendant's letter motions are "relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process,' thereby qualifying as a "judicial document" for purposes of the first element of the Lugosch test. United States v. Amodeo ("Amodeo I"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. Id. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978).
Nevertheless, in balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission and in the corresponding exhibits The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/14/2020) (ap) (Entered: 12/14/2020)
12/14/2020 96 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R. Everdell dated December 8, 2020 re: Cover Letter for Renewed Bail Application (Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020)
12/14/2020 97 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re: Renewed Motion for Bail. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X)(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 12/14/2020)
12/17/2020 98 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Andrew Rohrbach appearing for USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2020)
12/18/2020 99 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 16, 2020, the Government filed its opposition to Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed application for bail. In accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89, the Government filed its materials under seal and proposed narrowly tailored redactions on
DOJ-OGR-00019732

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document