This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-58) covering entries from December 10 to December 18, 2020, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan approving redactions for a renewed bail application to protect the privacy interests of third parties, notices of transcript filings, and the entry of appearance by attorney Andrew Rohrbach for the government. The document also lists the filing of a Memorandum of Law in support of bail accompanied by numerous exhibits (A through X).
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the court proceedings, filing renewed bail application.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Presiding judge signing orders and overseeing proceedings.
|
| Kristen Carannante | Court Reporter/Transcriber |
Recorded the conference held on 7/14/2020.
|
| Kelly McGuirk | Deputy Clerk |
Entered transcript notices into the record.
|
| Christian R. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Sent letter to Judge Nathan; filed Memorandum of Law in support of bail.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | Attorney |
Filed Notice of Attorney Appearance for the USA.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USA |
Plaintiff/Prosecution (United States of America), represented by Andrew Rohrbach.
|
|
| Second Circuit |
Court whose legal precedents (Lugosch, Amodeo) are cited in the Order.
|
|
| Department of Justice |
Indicated by footer DOJ-OGR.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied venue based on Judge Nathan and docket format.
|
"The Court finds that Defendant's letter motions are 'relevant to the performance of the judicial function and useful in the judicial process,' thereby qualifying as a 'judicial document'"Source
"the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant's submission"Source
"The Government did not file any opposition to the Defendant's proposed redactions."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (4,767 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document