DOJ-OGR-00020607.jpg
502 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal affirmation / court filing
File Size:
502 KB
Summary
This document is an affirmation filed on January 16, 2023, by attorney John M. Leventhal in the US Court of Appeals Second Circuit regarding the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket 22-1426). Leventhal requests permission to file an oversized brief and outlines the procedural history, including previous scheduling requests and a pending motion to extend the deadline to February 28, 2023. He notes that the US Attorney's Office for the SDNY has no objection to the time extension.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| John M. Leventhal | Attorney |
Partner at Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins PC; Attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell; Author of the affirmation.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant-Appellant |
The subject of the appeal and client of John M. Leventhal.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit |
The court where the appeal is being heard.
|
|
| United States of America |
The opposing party in the case.
|
|
| Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins PC |
The firm representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
|
| United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York |
Representing the Appellee; indicated they had no objection to the time extension.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2022-07-15
2022-07-28
Filed a scheduling request asking for brief due date of Jan 30, 2023.
US Court of Appeals Second Circuit
2023-01-12
Filed a motion to extend time to file Appellant's brief to Feb 28, 2023.
US Court of Appeals Second Circuit
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
State where John M. Leventhal is admitted to practice.
|
|
|
Jurisdiction of the opposing US Attorney's Office.
|
Relationships (2)
Leventhal identifies himself as 'attorney for Defendant-Appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell'.
Case caption lists USA as Appellee against Maxwell as Defendant-Appellant.
Key Quotes (3)
"Appellee United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York had no objection."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020607.jpg
Quote #1
"Appellant's principal brief must be no longer than 14,000 words."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020607.jpg
Quote #2
"hereby affirms the following statements, under penalties of perjury"Source
DOJ-OGR-00020607.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,670 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 43, 01/16/2023, 3452785, Page2 of 4
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND CIRCUIT
-------------------------------------------------------X
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
SECOND CIRCUIT
-------------------------------------------------------X
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee,
- against -
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------------------------------------------X
-------------------------------------------------------X
Docket No.: 22-1426
AFFIRMATION IN
SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANT-
APPELLANT'S
MOTION TO FILE
AN OVERSIZED
BRIEF
SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANT-
APPELLANT'S
MOTION TO FILE
AN OVERSIZED
BRIEF
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the State of
New York and a partner of the law firm of AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS PC., attorneys
for Defendant-Appellant, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, hereby affirms the following
statements, under penalties of perjury:
New York and a partner of the law firm of AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS PC., attorneys
for Defendant-Appellant, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, hereby affirms the following
statements, under penalties of perjury:
1. That I am a partner at the law firm of AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS P.C.,
attorneys for Defendant-Appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell (hereinafter "Appellant"), and as such,
am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances of this action.
attorneys for Defendant-Appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell (hereinafter "Appellant"), and as such,
am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances of this action.
3. On July 15, 2022, I filed a Notice of Appearance in this matter.
4. On July 28, 2022, I filed a scheduling request asking that Appellant's brief be
due on January 30, 2023, based on the size of the record.
due on January 30, 2023, based on the size of the record.
5. On January 12, 2023, I filed a motion to extend time to file Appellant's brief to
February 28, 2023, to which Appellee United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District
of New York had no objection. This motion is still pending.
February 28, 2023, to which Appellee United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District
of New York had no objection. This motion is still pending.
6. Pursuant to Local Rule 32.1(a)(4), Appellant's principal brief must be no longer
than 14,000 words.
than 14,000 words.
7. Pursuant to Local Rule 27.1(e)(2), a party seeking to file an oversized brief must
state the requested length and the reasons for exceeding this Court's limitations.
state the requested length and the reasons for exceeding this Court's limitations.
1
DOJ-OGR-00020607
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document