EFTA00014538.pdf
93 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email correspondence
File Size:
93 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain from July 2019 discussing legal proceedings related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Jeffrey Epstein's Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). An attorney representing victims 'Jane Doe 1 and 2' updates other parties (likely government officials or other counsel) on recent filings, arguing that the NPA does not extend to New York and is limited to Florida crimes. The thread also notes a recent motion by Epstein's lawyer, Marty Weinberg, regarding the scope of the NPA.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe 1 | Victim/Plaintiff |
Mentioned as filing in the Florida CVRA case.
|
| Jane Doe 2 | Victim/Plaintiff |
Mentioned as filing in the Florida CVRA case.
|
| Judge Marra | Judge |
Presiding judge expected to rule on the motion for a sur-reply.
|
| Marty Weinberg | Lawyer for Jeffrey Epstein |
Filed a motion for a sur-reply discussing the scope of the NPA.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Mentioned as 'Epstein's lawyer (Marty Weinberg)'.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Utah State Bar |
The sender of the main email is admitted to this bar.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2019-07-24
Epstein's lawyer Marty Weinberg filed a motion for a sur-reply.
Florida
Relationships (2)
Described as 'Epstein's lawyer (Marty Weinberg)'.
Author of 13:01 Email
→
Attorney-Client
→
Jane Doe 1 and 2
Signed 'for Jane Doe 1 and 2' and refers to 'My clients'.
Key Quotes (4)
"My clients were told back in 2013 that the NPA did not extend to New York or other jurisdictions – and that is the point we are making to Judge Marra."Source
EFTA00014538.pdf
Quote #1
"Judge Marra must craft remedies in the case that relate solely to Florida crimes and Florida victims ... because the NPA only covers Florida."Source
EFTA00014538.pdf
Quote #2
"But yesterday Epstein's lawyer (Marty Weinberg) filed a motion for a sur-reply."Source
EFTA00014538.pdf
Quote #3
"we wanted to talk with you about a question in connection with your expertise on the CVRA generally."Source
EFTA00014538.pdf
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (3,368 characters)
From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: Re: Briefing in Florida regarding whether the Florida NPA extends to New York
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 02:23:51 +0000
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: Re: Briefing in Florida regarding whether the Florida NPA extends to New York
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 02:23:51 +0000
Perfect - call my cell - [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] - sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and errors.
[REDACTED] - sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and errors.
On Jul 25, 2019, at 8:21 PM, [REDACTED] wrote:
Thanks very much. Would 10:00 a.m. tomorrow your time (noon our time) work? If so, we can call you then at [REDACTED], or if not, we could also do 2:00 p.m. your time.
thanks,
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 22:13
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: Re: Briefing in Florida regarding whether the Florida NPA extends to New York
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 22:13
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: Re: Briefing in Florida regarding whether the Florida NPA extends to New York
Happy to chat tomorrow. Name your time that’s convenient for you.
[REDACTED] - sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and errors.
On Jul 25, 2019, at 8:07 PM, [REDACTED] wrote:
[REDACTED],
Thank you for sending us these materials, we appreciate being able to stay up to date, and we’ll continue to keep an eye on the docket for submissions that may be relevant for our investigation.
Separately, might you be available for a quick call sometime tomorrow (Friday) or next week? No rush or emergency, but we wanted to talk with you about a question in connection with your expertise on the CVRA generally. At your convenience.
thanks,
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 13:01
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Briefing in Florida regarding whether the Florida NPA extends to New York
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 13:01
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Briefing in Florida regarding whether the Florida NPA extends to New York
EFTA00014538
Hi [REDACTED],
I wanted to make you aware of a recent filing (on Tuesday) by Jane Doe 1 and 2 in the Florida CVRA case. See attached. You may find interesting our argument at pp. 3-6, in which we explain why Judge Marra must craft remedies in the case that relate solely to Florida crimes and Florida victims ... because the NPA only covers Florida.
We filed our reply brief on remedies on Tuesday – and that should have brought all briefing on remedies for the CVRA violation to a close. But yesterday Epstein's lawyer (Marty Weinberg) filed a motion for a sur-reply. See attached. In point (a) on page 2, he argues that he should have an opportunity to file a sur-reply discussing, among other things, the scope of the NPA. On Monday, we will be filing an opposition to Weinberg extending the briefing further. It appears that Judge Marra is poised to rule rapidly on the motion for a sur-reply, as he asked for us to respond quickly.
I wanted to make you aware of these developments. My clients were told back in 2013 that the NPA did not extend to New York or other jurisdictions – and that is the point we are making to Judge Marra.
[REDACTED] for Jane Doe 1 and 2
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED] (phone) [REDACTED] (fax)
[REDACTED]
You can access my publications on [REDACTED]
CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. [REDACTED] is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Any views he expresses in this email are his own.
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED] (phone) [REDACTED] (fax)
[REDACTED]
You can access my publications on [REDACTED]
CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. [REDACTED] is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Any views he expresses in this email are his own.
EFTA00014539
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document