HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021347.jpg

1.62 MB

Extraction Summary

2
People
0
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Academic/scientific article page (evidence file)
File Size: 1.62 MB
Summary

This document appears to be page 101 of an academic or scientific text titled 'Inferring Minds Where None Can Be Seen.' It discusses the psychology of the 'social brain,' empathy, and anthropomorphism. It references researchers Nick Epley and Clark Gilpin in the context of how humans attribute minds to non-agents and how religion utilizes these psychological impulses. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021347' bates stamp, indicating it is part of a larger collection of evidence, likely related to the House Oversight Committee's investigation.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Nick Epley Researcher/Author (referenced)
Discusses how anthropomorphism is rooted in an egocentric view of others.
Clark Gilpin Researcher/Author (referenced)
Discusses how religions use the social brain to understand God.

Timeline (1 events)

World War II
Bombing of London (historical reference used as an example of discerning patterns in randomness)
London
citizens of London

Locations (1)

Location Context

Key Quotes (4)

"The social brain seeks connections with others."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021347.jpg
Quote #1
"Anthropomorphism is the basis for predicting behavior and thoughts and goals."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021347.jpg
Quote #2
"Even when there is no agent to be seen, events in the world may be understood by attributing them to unseen agents."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021347.jpg
Quote #3
"Clark Gilpin discusses how religions may use this aspect of the social brain to achieve an understanding of God and what God wants."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021347.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,086 characters)

Page | 101
Inferring Minds Where None Can Be Seen
The social brain seeks connections with others. But what is the foundation that we use to build such connections? We experience empathy as a form of emotional resonance and understanding of other people. This connection allows us to comfort and support and celebrate with others. Being in tune with emotional states of others allows us to respond in ways that strengthen a group. But how do we understand the thoughts and goals of others? How do we predict choices and decisions to facilitate cooperation in groups? Anthropomorphism is the basis for predicting behavior and thoughts and goals. Nick Epley discusses how anthropomorphism is rooted in an egocentric view of others. Moreover our view of others is not confined to the others that are people. It is perhaps reflective of the deep and fundamental nature of anthropomorphism in the social brain that its anthropomorphic inferences about agents can be derived from observed behavior, allowing us to understand “minds” where none may exist, as in mechanical toys or alarm clocks. Of course we tend to understand those minds by thinking they are just like us.
Even when there is no agent to be seen, events in the world may be understood by attributing them to unseen agents. During World War II, the bombing of London was demonstrably random, but citizens of London could not help but discern intentional patterns in the attacks. As Epley points out, hurricanes and floods are even today attributed to the hand of God, perhaps an angry God. Clark Gilpin discusses how religions may use this aspect of the social brain to achieve an understanding of God and what God wants. This kind of anthropomorphism can be taken to different metaphoric extremes in personifying God as father or friend. But an overly concrete personification may have costs perhaps diminishing the universality and pervasiveness of God in other religions. Thus religions may differ in theological perspective on the value of the anthropomorphic impulse inherent in the social brain.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021347

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document