This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca questions the witness about inconsistencies with prior testimony from 2009 and asks if she ingested 'angel trumpets' while traveling to Jeffrey Epstein's house. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) objects to the impeachment attempt, and the Judge sustains it, ruling the testimony is 'not inconsistent.'
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Under cross-examination regarding prior testimony and events involving Epstein.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Conducting the cross-examination of the witness.
|
| Ms. Comey | Prosecuting Attorney |
Raises an objection to Pagliuca's line of questioning.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the trial, ruling on objections.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject |
Mentioned as 'Mr. Epstein', specifically referring to his house.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where the witness allegedly went while ingesting 'angel trumpets'.
|
"Q. You also ingested something called angel trumpets when you were going to Mr. Epstein's house, do you recall that?"Source
"A. That's a flower. I don't think you should ingest those at all."Source
"THE COURT: Not inconsistent."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,136 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document