This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge and Prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding witness conduct, specifically whether witnesses were instructed not to confer with one another. Ms. Moe confirms it is standard practice to instruct witnesses not to speak to each other, and discloses a meeting 'last night' with a witness named Brian, who revealed he had spoken with another witness, Jane.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Government Attorney/Prosecutor |
Answering the Court's questions regarding witness instructions and a meeting with a witness named Brian.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Questioning the prosecution about instructions given to witnesses regarding conferring with one another.
|
| Brian | Witness |
Met with the government 'last night' and reported a conversation he had with Jane.
|
| Jane | Witness |
Spoke to Brian; noted as being subject to recall and recross. (Likely a pseudonym for a victim/witness).
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Referenced by The Court and represented by Ms. Moe.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00018604.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the court reporter's name (Southern District of New York).
|
"my understanding is that he understood the rules about that; and that we couldn't speak with her"Source
"it's our practice -- and what we did in this case -- is to tell every witness that their memory should be their memories and they shouldn't be talking to other witnesses before the trial."Source
"Last night we had a meeting with Brian. And he, unprompted, mentioned that he had heard from Jane that she"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,594 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document