HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022231.jpg
2.63 MB
Extraction Summary
4
People
7
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
4
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Reputation management report / memo
File Size:
2.63 MB
Summary
This undated document is a status report to 'Jeffrey' (presumed to be Epstein) from a contractor managing his online reputation. The report details successful efforts to manipulate Google search results and 'hack' his Wikipedia page to remove negative information like 'convicted sex offender' and replace his mug shot. The contractor also discusses ongoing challenges, an outstanding payment of $7500 to a technical vendor named Mike, and the need for a decision on the project's continuation.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey | Client |
The recipient of the report, presumed to be Jeffrey Epstein, for whom the online reputation management services are b...
|
| Jessica | Content Contributor (unfulfilled) |
Mentioned as someone who failed to provide any original content for the 'science and the org site', which hindered ef...
|
| Mike | Technical Support / Vendor |
Received a payment of $2500 for replacement servers. A balance of $7500 is due to him for the project to continue.
|
| Unnamed 'daily beast foe' | Adversary / Journalist |
Described as a female individual associated with the Daily Beast who is actively trying to promote her sites against ...
|
Organizations (7)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
|
The search engine being manipulated to improve Jeffrey's search results.
|
||
| Huffington Post |
A media outlet with a negative article about Jeffrey that was difficult to remove from the first page of Google searc...
|
|
| Daily Beast |
A media outlet whose negative article was successfully 'far removed' from search results. An unnamed female 'foe' fro...
|
|
| Wikipedia |
A key target of the reputation management. The author claims to have 'hacked' the site to replace Jeffrey's mug shot ...
|
|
| Epstein Foundation |
Mentioned as one of the positive topics ('Philanthrophic work, Epstein Foundation, Promotion of Scientists') added to...
|
|
| The Edge |
A website or page that was successfully promoted from 'page 5 of google search' to the front page.
|
|
| HOUSE_OVERSIGHT |
The source of the document as indicated by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022231', suggesting it is part of a congressio...
|
Timeline (3 events)
Undated
Jeffrey's Wikipedia page was edited to remove negative information and replace his mug shot. The author states, 'We hacked the site to replace the mug shot and caption.'
Wikipedia
Unnamed author/contractor
Undated
A negative article from the 'daily beast' was successfully pushed down in Google search results.
Google
Unnamed author/contractor
Relationships (4)
The entire document is a report from the author to Jeffrey detailing paid reputation management services.
The document states 'You paid Mike $2500' and that a balance of his fee is due from Jeffrey.
The author mentions Jessica's failure to provide content as a setback for the project.
The document describes a 'foe' at the Daily Beast who is actively working against Jeffrey's online presence.
Key Quotes (4)
"We hacked the site to replace the mug shot and caption, and now has an entirely different photo and caption. This was a big success."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022231.jpg
Quote #1
"Wikipedia was an important victory, as it will always be at the top of the search engine results. ow the head lines do not mention convicted sex offender or pedophile. Instead, Philanthrophic work, Epstein Foundation, Promotion of Scientists."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022231.jpg
Quote #2
"Your daily beast foe is still at it, and trying to promote her sites against you in the same way that we try to depromote you."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022231.jpg
Quote #3
"You paid Mike $2500, which he applied for the purchasing of his replacement servers, but his fee of $7500 balance is now due if you want to continue."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022231.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (3,697 characters)
Jeffrey,
The bots did the sweep. Here are the new results taken as of a minute ago. You have only one negative article left on front page of google, which is the Huffington Post article. The Huffington Post is extremely hard to move, because it is so powerful, has millions of links to it, and uploads massive new and original content it on a daily basis with posting from out side readers. We managed to push it down the page, as it used to be at the top. If we were able to post original content to both the science and the org site (absolutely not a single word to this day by Jessica, just talk), we would have been able to push it down even further, and off the page. WE did manage to get rid of the daily beast article, which is now far removed, inspite of their own efforts to keep it prominent.
Toxic suggested search engine terms that popped up automatically when you typed in your name are also now removed.
Wikipedia was an important victory, as it will always be at the top of the search engine results. ow the head lines do not mention convicted sex offender or pedophile. Instead, Philanthrophic work, Epstein Foundation, Promotion of Scientists. We have stopped the hacking on your wiki site, and that was a major effor. Your wiki entry now is pretty tame, and bad stuff has been muted, bowlerized, and pused to the bottom. Careful editing and wording has muted the effect immensely. We hacked the site to replace the mug shot and caption, and now has an entirely different photo and caption. This was a big success.
We pushed the Edge all the way up to the front page, where it was previously buried on page 5 of google search.
We have promoted the other jeffrey epsteins, and other pages are also filled with your material.
And, while the sites are up, and in the direction we hoped, they are still new, and subject to volitility, especially if new original content is not added on a minimum of a weekly basis. I have been forbideen to add new content to the philanthrophic site as well as the science site, and therefore, as a result our rating slipped down (still on the first page, but would have liked them (and some of the articles to been able to push Huffington off page). We also helped with you images, and the first images that come of you on a google search are not of your mug shot, etc.
Your daily beast foe is still at it, and trying to promote her sites against you in the same way that we try to depromote you.
As far as this site is concerned, and the continuation of this, I do not know what you wish to do. Clearly, you have no interest in my continuing. And, I am not sure if you want to continue the project at all. If the latter, and you stop, eventually it will just go into the way of entropy, and it will return to the old form. The major work has been done, but it needs to be maintained. For it to get better results, it needs to have constant input and supervision, and that means generating proper content, not just editing and grammatical fixes. Writers need to know what to write. THe philanthrophy site is at the bottom of the page precisely because you have not allowed us to add any content to it, and as a result it suffers.
You paid Mike $2500, which he applied for the purchasing of his replacement servers, but his fee of $7500 balance is now due if you want to continue. Please let me know what you want to do. I need to inform him, and if you are not going to use him, he needs to take on his other clients and devote his time there.
This needs to be contrasted with what we started with, which was a search on your name, which had nine/10 very toxic prominent stories, and toxic Wiki article and headline.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022231
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document