DOJ-OGR-00017231.jpg

652 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript / jury instructions
File Size: 652 KB
Summary

This document is page 210 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It contains the judge's charge to the jury regarding the legal standards for finding Ghislaine Maxwell guilty of 'aiding and abetting' in Counts Two, Four, and Six. The text defines the necessity of proving willful association with the crime while clarifying that mere presence or knowledge of the crime is insufficient for conviction.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of jury instructions regarding charges of aiding and abetting.
The Government Prosecution
Entity required to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Another person Perpetrator
Unspecified individual who actually committed the primary offense which Maxwell is accused of aiding.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Agency responsible for the transcript.
DOJ
Department of Justice, indicated by Bates stamp prefix DOJ-OGR.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Filing of court transcript containing jury charge.
Court
Ghislaine Maxwell Jury Judge

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by case number and reporter location (SDNY).

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell Alleged Accomplice Another person
Charges of aiding, abetting, counseling, commanding, inducing, or procuring that person to commit a crime.

Key Quotes (3)

"you may find Ms. Maxwell guilty of the offenses charged in Counts Two, Four, and Six if you find beyond a reasonable doubt that the government has proven that another person actually committed the offense"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017231.jpg
Quote #1
"To aid or abet another to commit a crime, it is necessary that the government prove that the defendant willfully and knowingly associated herself in some way with the crime"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017231.jpg
Quote #2
"the mere presence of the defendant where a crime is being committed... is not sufficient to make the defendant guilty under this approach of aiding and abetting."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017231.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,658 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 210 of 257 3044
LCKVMAX8 Charge
1 herself. Accordingly, you may find Ms. Maxwell guilty of the
2 offenses charged in Counts Two, Four, and Six if you find
3 beyond a reasonable doubt that the government has proven that
4 another person actually committed the offense with which Ms.
5 Maxwell is charged, and that Ms. Maxwell aided, abetted,
6 counseled, commanded, induced, or procured that person to
7 commit the crime.
8 As you can see, the first requirement is that another
9 person has committed the crime charged. Obviously, no one can
10 be convicted of aided and abetting the criminal acts of another
11 if no crime was committed by the other person. But if you find
12 that a crime was committed, then you must consider whether Ms.
13 Maxwell aided or abetted the commission of the crime.
14 To aid or abet another to commit a crime, it is
15 necessary that the government prove that the defendant
16 willfully and knowingly associated herself in some way with the
17 crime committed by the other person, and willfully and
18 knowingly sought by some act to help commit the crime succeed.
19 However, let me caution you that the mere presence of
20 the defendant where a crime is being committed, even coupled
21 with knowledge by the defendant that a crime is being
22 committed, or the mere acquiescence by a defendant in the
23 criminal conduct of others, even with guilty knowledge, is not
24 sufficient to make the defendant guilty under this approach of
25 aiding and abetting. Such a defendant would be guilty under
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017231

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document