DOJ-OGR-00016472.jpg

599 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 599 KB
Summary

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed Aug 10, 2022) recording a discussion between the prosecution (represented by Ms. Moe) and the defense (Ms. Menninger) regarding the timeline for redacting government and defense exhibits. The prosecution argues against a 'fire drill' urgency, proposing to resolve issues over the weekend, which the Court accepts. The discussion then pivots to an attorney-client privilege issue.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ms. Moe Attorney (Likely Government/Prosecution)
Speaking to the court regarding redaction schedules and communications with the defense.
Ms. Menninger Attorney (Defense)
Mentioned by Ms. Moe as having emailed the government; speaks at the end regarding attorney-client privilege stipulat...
The Court Judge
Presiding over the hearing, setting the timeline for the weekend.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Government
Referred to as the recipient of Ms. Menninger's email.
Defense
Referred to as the party conferring with the government.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court hearing regarding redaction of exhibits and attorney-client privilege issues.
Courtroom (Southern District)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Indicated in the footer by the reporter's organization name.

Relationships (1)

Ms. Moe Opposing Counsel Ms. Menninger
Discussing negotiations over redactions and scheduling; Ms. Moe refers to Ms. Menninger's email.

Key Quotes (3)

"We don't understand the particular urgency with respect to these exhibits."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016472.jpg
Quote #1
"I don't see the need for a fire drill redaction resolution this evening"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016472.jpg
Quote #2
"We'll get all of that done this weekend."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016472.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,494 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 256 of 267 2284
LCAVMAX8
1 number of exhibits, both defense exhibits and government
2 exhibits, that need additional redactions. And we agreed over
3 the break we would work diligently to resolve the full slate of
4 pending redactions issues. We don't understand the particular
5 urgency with respect to these exhibits.
6 Ms. Menninger is right, that she did email the
7 government last night in the evening while, as the Court is
8 aware, we were tending to other matters. I don't understand
9 the particular urgency with respect to these exhibits. And
10 again, we conferred with the defense this morning to confirm
11 they would resolve all the pending redaction issues over the
12 weekend. That seems entirely reasonable, given how many
13 redaction issues we'll be resolving.
14 We're still waiting to hear from the defense on a
15 number of redactions and we'll work together on that issue. I
16 don't see the need for a fire drill redaction resolution this
17 evening; and so I think the proposal we discussed this morning
18 is reasonable. We're going to get those issued resolved in
19 full.
20 THE COURT: We'll get all of that done this weekend.
21 Thank you.
22 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.
23 THE COURT: The attorney-client privilege issue.
24 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I think we very well may
25 be able to reach some type of stipulation, as your Honor
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016472

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document